Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Because of the pervasive nature of broadcasting, it has less First Amendment protection than other forms of communication. The F.C.C. was justified in concluding that Carlin's "Filthy Words" broadcast, though not obscene, was indecent, and subject to restriction.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Federal_Communications_Commission_v._Pacifica_Foundation holding "Because of the pervasive nature of broadcasting, it has less First Amendment protection than other forms of communication. The F.C.C. was justified in concluding that Carlin's "Filthy Words" broadcast, though not obscene, was indecent, and subject to restriction.".