Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994] 1 All ER 53 is a case in English tort law that established the principle that claims under nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher must include a requirement that the damage be foreseeable; it also suggested that Rylands was a sub-set of nuisance rather than an independent tort, a debate eventually laid to rest in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.The Cambridge Water Company were a company responsible for providing potable water to the inhabitants of Cambridge and the surrounding areas. . }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Cambridge_Water_Co_Ltd_v_Eastern_Counties_Leather_plc comment "Cambridge Water Co Ltd v Eastern Counties Leather plc [1994] 1 All ER 53 is a case in English tort law that established the principle that claims under nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher must include a requirement that the damage be foreseeable; it also suggested that Rylands was a sub-set of nuisance rather than an independent tort, a debate eventually laid to rest in Transco plc v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council.The Cambridge Water Company were a company responsible for providing potable water to the inhabitants of Cambridge and the surrounding areas. ".