Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Florence v. Shurtleff, No. 2:05CV00495 DB was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King’s English v. Shurtleff, by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of Utah Law H.B. 260.. }
Showing items 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 items per page.
- Florence_v._Shurtleff abstract "Florence v. Shurtleff, No. 2:05CV00495 DB was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King’s English v. Shurtleff, by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of Utah Law H.B. 260.".
- Florence_v._Shurtleff comment "Florence v. Shurtleff, No. 2:05CV00495 DB was a case in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah issued an order stating that individuals could not be prosecuted for posting adult content that was constitutionally protected on general access websites. The order was the result of a 2005 lawsuit, The King’s English v. Shurtleff, by Utah bookstores, artists, Internet Service Providers and the other organizations challenging the constitutionality of Utah Law H.B. 260.".