Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Jerome Prince was Dean of Brooklyn Law School from 1953 to 1971. He was also a well-known evidence scholar.Prince was born in Manhattan, and had two brothers. His father was a tobacco salesman. Prince graduated from City College cum laude where he was Phi Beta Kappa, and earned two degrees at Brooklyn Law School, an LLB in 1933 and an SJD in 1934 – both summa cum laude, as he was Editor in Chief of the Brooklyn Law Review. He joined the faculty in 1934, and first became vice dean in 1945 and assistant dean, before becoming dean in 1953.After retiring, Prince remained on the faculty, continuing to teach the law of evidence, his specialty, until he died in 1988.Prince was married twice, the second time to the former Elaine Lederman. He had two daughters from his first marriage.The Dean Jerome Prince Evidence Competition is an annual competition hosted by Brooklyn Law School. Participants write an appellate brief and then present an oral argument on an evidentiary issue in a contemporary context.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Jerome_Prince abstract "Jerome Prince was Dean of Brooklyn Law School from 1953 to 1971. He was also a well-known evidence scholar.Prince was born in Manhattan, and had two brothers. His father was a tobacco salesman. Prince graduated from City College cum laude where he was Phi Beta Kappa, and earned two degrees at Brooklyn Law School, an LLB in 1933 and an SJD in 1934 – both summa cum laude, as he was Editor in Chief of the Brooklyn Law Review. He joined the faculty in 1934, and first became vice dean in 1945 and assistant dean, before becoming dean in 1953.After retiring, Prince remained on the faculty, continuing to teach the law of evidence, his specialty, until he died in 1988.Prince was married twice, the second time to the former Elaine Lederman. He had two daughters from his first marriage.The Dean Jerome Prince Evidence Competition is an annual competition hosted by Brooklyn Law School. Participants write an appellate brief and then present an oral argument on an evidentiary issue in a contemporary context.".