Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him.Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.. }
Showing items 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 items per page.
- Maples_v._Thomas abstract "Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him.Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.".
- Maples_v._Thomas comment "Maples v. Thomas, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), is a United States Supreme Court ruling in which the Court ruled 7–2 that Cory R. Maples, who had been convicted of murdering two people and faced a possible death sentence, should get another opportunity court because his lawyers at Sullivan & Cromwell had abandoned him.Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented from the Court's holding, arguing that the procedural default shouldn't be excused.".