Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Scalia dissented from the Court's opinion holding that a car ownership cost income exemption for Chapter 13 debtors was only available to car owners who made lease or loan payments. The relevant bankruptcy provision incorporated certain cost tables prepared by the IRS as part of the Chapter 13 means test for determining how much income debtors had available to repay creditors. Scalia believed that the statutory phrase "applicable monthly expense amounts" simply directed courts, in this instance, to look at the table column corresponding to how many cars the debtor owned, not to examine whether the debtor actually had real costs of that kind. He also disagreed with the Court's use, in aid of its interpretation, of IRS materials that were supplemental to the tables because the bankruptcy statutes did not incorporate or reference those materials in any way.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- 2010_term_United_States_Supreme_Court_opinions_of_Antonin_Scalia summary "Scalia dissented from the Court's opinion holding that a car ownership cost income exemption for Chapter 13 debtors was only available to car owners who made lease or loan payments. The relevant bankruptcy provision incorporated certain cost tables prepared by the IRS as part of the Chapter 13 means test for determining how much income debtors had available to repay creditors. Scalia believed that the statutory phrase "applicable monthly expense amounts" simply directed courts, in this instance, to look at the table column corresponding to how many cars the debtor owned, not to examine whether the debtor actually had real costs of that kind. He also disagreed with the Court's use, in aid of its interpretation, of IRS materials that were supplemental to the tables because the bankruptcy statutes did not incorporate or reference those materials in any way.".