Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p The President's unilateral striking of portions of legislation passed by Congress pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act was without legal force, because the U.S. Constitution did not authorize the President to enact federal law of which both houses of Congress had not previously approved the text. District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Clinton_v._City_of_New_York holding "The President's unilateral striking of portions of legislation passed by Congress pursuant to the Line Item Veto Act was without legal force, because the U.S. Constitution did not authorize the President to enact federal law of which both houses of Congress had not previously approved the text. District Court for the District of Columbia affirmed.".