Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General)> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 24 of
24
with 100 items per page.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) abstract "Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General) [1997] 2 S.C.R. 624, is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that expanded the application of the charter under section 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and was one of the first four rulings proceeding where the Court was sharply divided on the interpretation of section 15 of the Charter.Each of the appellants in this case was born Deaf and their preferred means of communication were sign language. They contended that the absence of interpreters impaired their ability to communicate with their doctors and other health care providers, and thus increased the risk of misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that sign language interpreters must be provided in the delivery of medical services where doing so is necessary to ensure effective communication.".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) wikiPageID "2223672".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) wikiPageRevisionID "578883143".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) caseName "Eldridge v. British Columbia".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) citations "[1997] 3 S.C.R. 624".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) decidedDate "1997-10-09".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) docket "24896".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) fullCaseName "Robin Susan Eldridge, John Henry Warren and Linda Jane Warren v. The Attorney General of British Columbia and the Medical Services Commission".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) hasPhotoCollection Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General).
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) heardDate "1997-04-24".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) ruling "Eldridge appeal allowed".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) scc "1992".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) unanimous "La Forest J.".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) subject Category:1997_in_Canadian_case_law.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) subject Category:Canadian_Charter_of_Rights_and_Freedoms_case_law.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) subject Category:Section_Fifteen_Charter_case_law.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) subject Category:Supreme_Court_of_Canada_cases.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) comment "Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General) [1997] 2 S.C.R. 624, is a leading decision by the Supreme Court of Canada that expanded the application of the charter under section 32 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and was one of the first four rulings proceeding where the Court was sharply divided on the interpretation of section 15 of the Charter.Each of the appellants in this case was born Deaf and their preferred means of communication were sign language.".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) label "Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General)".
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) sameAs m.06x74q.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) sameAs Q5354188.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) sameAs Q5354188.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) wasDerivedFrom Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General)?oldid=578883143.
- Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General) isPrimaryTopicOf Eldridge_v._British_Columbia_(Attorney_General).