Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Jones_(2012)> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 62 of
62
with 100 items per page.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) abstract "United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.In 2005 defendant Antoine Jones was suspected of drug trafficking. Police investigators asked for and received a warrant to attach a GPS tracking device to the underside of the defendant's car but then exceeded the warrant's scope in both geography and length of time. The Supreme Court justices voted unanimously that this was a "search" under the Fourth Amendment, although they were split 5-4 as to the fundamental reasons behind that conclusion. The majority held that by physically installing the GPS device on the defendants car, the police had committed a trespass against Jones' "personal effects" – this trespass, in an attempt to obtain information, constituted a search per se. This conclusion, the majority stated, was consistent with the Court’s early Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, which it said was tied to common-law trespass until the latter half of the 20th Century. Most later cases, the court said, have deviated from that exclusively property-based approach, and more commonly turn on the invasion of one's right to privacy. The minority of the justices followed that later approach, and concluded that "long-term" GPS surveillance – four weeks, in this case – constituted a search that violated Jones' "reasonable expectation of privacy".Having reached the conclusion that this was a search under the Fourth Amendment, the Court declined to examine whether the search could be "reasonable", as they were not asked to do so. Also left unanswered was the broader question surrounding the constitutionality of the warrantless use of GPS data absent a physical intrusion – as might occur, for example, with the electronic collection of GPS data from wireless service providers or factory-installed vehicle tracking and navigation services. These open questions remain to be decided by some future case.".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=6122276400056758151&hl=en.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink R42511.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 2010-1259.pet.aa.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 10-1259.htm.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 10-1259.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 10-1259.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink 10-01259qp.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageExternalLink maynard_decision.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageID "32337981".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wikiPageRevisionID "606137327".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) arguedate "--11-08".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) argueyear "2011".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) case "United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ___ , Docket 10-1259".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) concurrence "Alito".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) concurrence "Sotomayor".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) decidedate "--01-23".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) decideyear "2012".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) docket "10".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) findlaw getcase.pl?court=us&vol=000&invol=10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) fullname "United States v. Antoine Jones".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) hasPhotoCollection United_States_v._Jones_(2012).
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) holding "The Government's attachment of the GPS device to the vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle's movements, constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment. DC Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) joinconcurrence "Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) joinmajority "Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Sotomayor".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) justia 10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) lawsapplied Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) litigants "United States v. Antoine Jones".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) majority "Scalia".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) oralargument argument_audio_detail.aspx?argument=10-1259.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) otherSource "Google Scholar".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) otherSource "U.S. Supreme Court".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) otherUrl scholar_case?case=6122276400056758151&hl=en.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) otherUrl 10-1259.pdf.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) parallelcitations "172800.0".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) prior "25920.0".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) scotus "2010".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) uspage "___".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) usvol "565".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:2012_in_United_States_case_law.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:Search_and_seizure_case_law.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:Surveillance.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:United_States_controlled_substances_case_law.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) subject Category:United_States_privacy_case_law.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) type Case.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) type LegalCase.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) type UnitOfWork.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) type Situation.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) comment "United States v. Jones, 132 S. Ct. 945, 565 U.S. ___ (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that installing a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device on a vehicle and using the device to monitor the vehicle's movements constitutes a search under the Fourth Amendment.In 2005 defendant Antoine Jones was suspected of drug trafficking.".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) label "United States v. Jones (2012)".
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) sameAs m.0gyrk8x.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) sameAs Q15128459.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) sameAs Q15128459.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) wasDerivedFrom United_States_v._Jones_(2012)?oldid=606137327.
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) isPrimaryTopicOf United_States_v._Jones_(2012).
- United_States_v._Jones_(2012) name "United States v. Antoine Jones".