Matches in UGent Biblio for { ?s ?p Modern compilers implement a large number of optimizations which all interact in complex ways, and which all have a different impact oil code quality, compilation time, code size, energy consumption, etc. For this reason, compilers typically provide a limited number of standard optimization levels, such as -01, -02, -03 and -0s, that combine various optimizations providing a number of trade-offs between multiple objective functions (such as code quality, compilation time and code size). The construction of these optimization levels, i.e., choosing which optimizations to activate at each level, is a manual process typically done using high-level heuristics based on the compiler developer's experience. This paper proposes COLE, Compiler Optimization Level Exploration, a framework or automatically finding Pareto optimal optimization levels through multi-objective evolutionary searching. Our experimental results using GCC and the SPEC CPU benchmarks show that the automatic construction of optimization levels is feasible in practice, and in addition, yields better optimization levels than GCC's manually derived (-0s, -01, -02 and -03) optimization levels, as well as the optimization levels obtained through random sampling. We also demonstrate that COLE can be used to gain insight into the effectiveness of compiler optimizations as well as to better understand a benchmark's sensitivity to compiler optimizations.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- aggregation abstract "Modern compilers implement a large number of optimizations which all interact in complex ways, and which all have a different impact oil code quality, compilation time, code size, energy consumption, etc. For this reason, compilers typically provide a limited number of standard optimization levels, such as -01, -02, -03 and -0s, that combine various optimizations providing a number of trade-offs between multiple objective functions (such as code quality, compilation time and code size). The construction of these optimization levels, i.e., choosing which optimizations to activate at each level, is a manual process typically done using high-level heuristics based on the compiler developer's experience. This paper proposes COLE, Compiler Optimization Level Exploration, a framework or automatically finding Pareto optimal optimization levels through multi-objective evolutionary searching. Our experimental results using GCC and the SPEC CPU benchmarks show that the automatic construction of optimization levels is feasible in practice, and in addition, yields better optimization levels than GCC's manually derived (-0s, -01, -02 and -03) optimization levels, as well as the optimization levels obtained through random sampling. We also demonstrate that COLE can be used to gain insight into the effectiveness of compiler optimizations as well as to better understand a benchmark's sensitivity to compiler optimizations.".