Data Portal @ linkeddatafragments.org

Matches in UGent Biblio for { ?s ?p Nonenzymatic peptide bond cleavage at asparagine (Asn) and glutamine (Gln) residues has been observed during peptide deamidation experiments; cleavage has also been reported at aspartic acid (Asp) and glutamic acid (Gin) residues. Although peptide backbone cleavage at Asn is known to be slower than deamidation, fragmentation products are often observed during peptide deamidation experiments. In this study, mechanisms leading to the cleavage of the carboxyl-side peptide bond of Asn and Asp residues were investigated using computational methods (B3LYP/6-31+G**). Single-point solvent calculations at the B3LYP/6-31++G** level were carried out in water, utilizing the integral equation formalism-polarizable continuum (IEF-PCM) model. Mechanism and energetics of peptide fragmentation at Asn were comparatively analyzed with previous calculations on deamidation of Asn. When deamidation proceeds through direct hydrolysis of the Asn side chain or through cyclic imide formation-via a tautomerization route-it exhibits lower activation barriers than peptide bond cleavage at Asn. The fundamental distinction between the mechanisms leading to deamidation-via a succinimide-and backbone cleavage was found to be the difference in nucleophilic entities involved in the cyclization process (backbone versus side-chain amide nitrogen). If deamidation is prevented by protein three-dimensional structure, cleavage may become a competing pathway. Fragmentation of the peptide backbone at Asp was also computationally studied to understand the likelihood of Asn deamidation preceding backbone cleavage. The activation barrier for backbone cleavage at Asp residues is much lower (approximately 10 kcal/mol) than that at Asn. This suggests that peptide bond cleavage at Asn residues is more likely to take place after it has deamidated into Asp.. }

• aggregation abstract "Nonenzymatic peptide bond cleavage at asparagine (Asn) and glutamine (Gln) residues has been observed during peptide deamidation experiments; cleavage has also been reported at aspartic acid (Asp) and glutamic acid (Gin) residues. Although peptide backbone cleavage at Asn is known to be slower than deamidation, fragmentation products are often observed during peptide deamidation experiments. In this study, mechanisms leading to the cleavage of the carboxyl-side peptide bond of Asn and Asp residues were investigated using computational methods (B3LYP/6-31+G**). Single-point solvent calculations at the B3LYP/6-31++G** level were carried out in water, utilizing the integral equation formalism-polarizable continuum (IEF-PCM) model. Mechanism and energetics of peptide fragmentation at Asn were comparatively analyzed with previous calculations on deamidation of Asn. When deamidation proceeds through direct hydrolysis of the Asn side chain or through cyclic imide formation-via a tautomerization route-it exhibits lower activation barriers than peptide bond cleavage at Asn. The fundamental distinction between the mechanisms leading to deamidation-via a succinimide-and backbone cleavage was found to be the difference in nucleophilic entities involved in the cyclization process (backbone versus side-chain amide nitrogen). If deamidation is prevented by protein three-dimensional structure, cleavage may become a competing pathway. Fragmentation of the peptide backbone at Asp was also computationally studied to understand the likelihood of Asn deamidation preceding backbone cleavage. The activation barrier for backbone cleavage at Asp residues is much lower (approximately 10 kcal/mol) than that at Asn. This suggests that peptide bond cleavage at Asn residues is more likely to take place after it has deamidated into Asp.".