Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne, 557 U.S. 52 (2009), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the Constitution's due process clause does not require states to turn over DNA evidence to a party seeking a civil suit under 42 U.S.C. §1983.The case concerned the conviction of William G. Osborne on charges related to the rape and beating of a prostitute.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- District_Attorney's_Office_v._Osborne comment "District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne, 557 U.S. 52 (2009), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the Constitution's due process clause does not require states to turn over DNA evidence to a party seeking a civil suit under 42 U.S.C. §1983.The case concerned the conviction of William G. Osborne on charges related to the rape and beating of a prostitute.".