Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p The Court ruled that the Sixth Circuit erred in setting aside a murder conviction in Ohio state court, because although the defendant's initial confession was given without the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, his subsequent confession was voluntary and therefore admissible against him.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- 2011_term_per_curiam_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States summary "The Court ruled that the Sixth Circuit erred in setting aside a murder conviction in Ohio state court, because although the defendant's initial confession was given without the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, his subsequent confession was voluntary and therefore admissible against him.".