Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc.> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 36 of
36
with 100 items per page.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. abstract "Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc. was an Eastern New York District Court decision regarding copyright infringement and breach of license agreement. Microsoft Corp. (referred to as "Microsoft" below) filed the lawsuit against Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc. (referred to as "Harmony" below) and its president, Stanley Furst (together referred to as the "defendants" below), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and treble damages. The defendants did not contest the plaintiff's claim that Harmony sold Microsoft's products without any licenses or authorization, or that they sold Microsoft's products stand-alone, which violated Microsoft's license agreement. Instead, the defendants argued that their action was protected by the first-sale doctrine 17 U.S.C §109(a) (1977). After reviewing the facts, the court found that the defendants' action constituted copyright infringement, and that the first-sale doctrine did not apply since the defendants failed to prove that the Microsoft products they sold were lawfully acquired. The court also ruled that the defendants breached Microsoft's software license agreement by selling the products stand-alone.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. wikiPageID "24485274".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. wikiPageRevisionID "585220642".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. citations "17280.0".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. court United_States_District_Court_for_the_Eastern_District_of_New_York.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. dateDecided "Feb. 7, 1994".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. fullName "Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Computers & Electronics, Inc.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. hasPhotoCollection Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc..
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. holding "Defendant's selling of copyrighted Microsoft products, without license or authorization, constituted copyright infringement, was not protected by the first-sale doctrine, and its distribution of the plaintiff's products in a stand-alone fashion violated the Microsoft License Agreement.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. judge Raymond_J._Dearie.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. keywords Copyright.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. keywords First-sale_doctrine.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. keywords Software_license.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. name "Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. subject Category:1994_in_United_States_case_law.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. subject Category:Microsoft_litigation.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. subject Category:United_States_copyright_case_law.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. subject Category:United_States_district_court_cases.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Abstraction100002137.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Act100030358.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type DueProcess101181475.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Event100029378.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type GroupAction101080366.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Lawsuit101182654.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Lawsuits.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type Proceeding101184814.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. comment "Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc. was an Eastern New York District Court decision regarding copyright infringement and breach of license agreement. Microsoft Corp. (referred to as "Microsoft" below) filed the lawsuit against Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc. (referred to as "Harmony" below) and its president, Stanley Furst (together referred to as the "defendants" below), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and treble damages.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. label "Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Comps. & Elecs., Inc.".
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. sameAs m.080658l.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. sameAs Q6840101.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. sameAs Q6840101.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. sameAs Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc..
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. wasDerivedFrom Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc.?oldid=585220642.
- Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc. isPrimaryTopicOf Microsoft_Corp._v._Harmony_Comps._&_Elecs.,_Inc..