Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p * Hungry Jack's breach of clause 2.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract, because clause 2.1 was not an essential term * clause 15.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract * Burger King was in breach of an implied term of good faith. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Burger_King_Corporation_v_Hungry_Jack's opinions "* Hungry Jack's breach of clause 2.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract, because clause 2.1 was not an essential term * clause 15.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract * Burger King was in breach of an implied term of good faith".