Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s <http://dbpedia.org/property/opinions> ?o. }
- 2008_Justice_and_Development_Party_closure_trial opinions "The Justice and Development Party not guilty of violating the principle of secularism. However, the party has become "a center for anti-secular activities", and the state shall only fund 50% of the party's activities, reduced from 100%.".
- A.D._Bedell_Wholesale_Co.,_Inc._v._Philip_Morris_Inc. opinions "Anthony Joseph Scirica".
- Abbey_National_Building_Society_v_Cann opinions "Lord Oliver of Aylmerton and Lord Jauncey of Tullichettle".
- Aberdeen_Railway_Co_v_Blaikie_Brothers opinions "Lord Cranworth LC".
- Adams_v._Howerton opinions "Wallace".
- Adams_v_Lindsell opinions "Law J".
- Adelaide_Company_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses_v_Commonwealth opinions "' the National Security Regulations did not contravene section 116 of the Australian Constitution ' the power under the regulations to seize any building containing property connected to a subversive association was beyond the Commonwealth's defence powers under s51 of the Constitution".
- Air_Caledonie_v_Commonwealth opinions "The Migration Amendment Act 1987 was invalid".
- Airlines_of_New_South_Wales_Pty_Ltd_v_New_South_Wales_(No_2) opinions "' Air Navigation Regulations 198 and 199 were held to be within power, as they promoted the safety of interstate trade and commerce ' Regulation 200B was held to be invalid as it went beyond being a safety measure".
- Airservices_Australia_v_Canadian_Airlines_International_Ltd opinions "The fee imposed under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 was not a tax".
- Al-Kateb_v_Godwin opinions "The Migration Act 1958 authorises unlawful non-citizens to be detained until they are removed from Australia, even when there is no prospect of their removal in the reasonably foreseeable future".
- Al-Kateb_v_Godwin opinions "The detention of non-citizens by the Executive pursuant to ss 189, 196 and 198 did not contravene Ch III of the Commonwealth Constitution, even if the removal of the non-citizen from Australia was not reasonably practicable in the foreseeable future.".
- Al-Kateb_v_Godwin opinions "The provisions of the Migration Act should not be interpreted by reference to international law".
- Alekseyev_v._Russia opinions "Unanimously, that the continued ban on gay rights marches in Moscow represented violations of Article 11 (freedom of assembly), Article 13 and Article 14 of the Convention.".
- Alexander_v_Standard_Telephones_&_Cables_Ltd_(No_2) opinions "Hobhouse J".
- Allcard_v_Skinner opinions "Lindley LJ, Cotton LJ".
- Allen_v_Flood opinions "Lord Halsbury LC, Lord Watson, Lord Ashbourne, Lord Herschell, Lord Macnaghten, Lord Morris, Lord Shand, Lord Davey, and Lord James of Hereford. Also invited to give opinions were Hawkins J, Mathew J, Cave J, North J, Wills J, Grantham J, Lawrance J and Wright J.".
- Allen_v_Gold_Reefs_of_West_Africa_Ltd opinions Nathaniel_Lindley,_Baron_Lindley.
- Alwin_v._State_Farm_Fire_and_Casualty_Co. opinions "Unanimous opinion by Cane".
- Amalgamated_Investment_and_Property_Co_Ltd_v_John_Walker_&_Sons_Ltd opinions "Buckley LJ".
- Amalgamated_Society_of_Engineers_v_Adelaide_Steamship_Co._Ltd. opinions "the States, when parties to an industrial dispute in fact, are subject to the Commonwealth legislation passed pursuant to s51(xxxv) of the Constitution.".
- American_Booksellers_Foundation_for_Free_Expression_v._Strickland opinions "Chief Judge Boyce F. Martin, Jr.".
- American_Booksellers_v._Hudnut opinions "Concurrence: Swygert".
- American_Booksellers_v._Hudnut opinions "Majority: Easterbrook".
- American_Civil_Liberties_Union_v._Schundler opinions "Dissent: Nygaard".
- American_Civil_Liberties_Union_v._Schundler opinions "Majority: Alito".
- Andrejeva_v._Latvia opinions "Majority: Costa, Rozakis, Bratza, Lorenzen, Tulkens, Casadevall, Cabral Barreto, Bîrsan, Vajić, Gyulumyan, Spielmann, Björgvinsson, Šikuta, Villiger, Berro-Lefèvre, Kalaydjieva Partial dissent: Ziemele".
- Andrews_v_Gas_Meter_Company opinions "Lindley LJ".
- Angel_v._Murray opinions "Unanimous opinion by Roberts".
- Anglo_Petroleum_Ltd_v_TFB_(Mortgages)_Ltd opinions "Toulson LJ".
- Anns_v_Merton_London_Borough_Council opinions "Established the two-stage Anns test whether a duty of care existed which requires: a ‘sufficient relationship of proximity based upon foreseeability’ between plaintiff and defendant; and considerations of reasons that there should not be a duty of care.".
- Anonymous_Online_Speakers_v._United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Nevada opinions "Cahill standard is too stringent and should not be applied to First Amendment claims of anonymous online speakers involving commercial speech.".
- Ashby_v_White opinions "Holt CJ, Powell J, Powys J, Gould J".
- Ashford_v_Thornton opinions "All judges gave opinions upholding the defendant's right to wage battle.".
- Asset_Marketing_Systems,_Inc._v._Gagnon opinions "Judge Milan D. Smith held that contractor Gagnon impliedly granted AMS an unlimited license, thus, AMS could not have misappropriated contractor's trade secret, and non-competition agreements were invalid.".
- Astley_v._Verdun opinions "In rare cases, if a person has defamed another person, the court may order an injunction against the defaming party from publishing anything in relation to the defamed party if the defaming party 1) intends to continue defaming the other party after the trial is over, and 2) there is no likelihood that the defaming party will compensate or pay damages to the defamed party.".
- Atala_Riffo_and_Daughters_v._Chile opinions "Laws which discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation are prohibited by the American Convention on Human Rights; sexual orientation is a suspect classification.".
- Atlas_Express_Ltd_v_Kafco opinions "Tucker J".
- Attorney_General_v_Davy opinions Philip_Yorke,_1st_Earl_of_Hardwicke.
- Attorney_General_v_De_Keyser's_Royal_Hotel_Ltd opinions "Lord Dunedin".
- Austin_v_Commonwealth opinions "' Confirmed one-limbed Melbourne Corporation principle that there are limits to the Commonwealth's ability to control the states. Commonwealth provisions cannot burden a state's structural integrity - its ability to exist or carry out its essential functions ' The Commonwealth imposition of a superannuation tax surcharge on judges was invalid.".
- Australian_Capital_Television_Pty_Ltd_v_Commonwealth opinions "' the Constitution provides for a system of responsible government, and the right to free political communication is an indispensable part of that system ' part IIID of the Broadcasting Act 1942 was invalid, because it contravened this implied right".
- Australian_Communist_Party_v_Commonwealth opinions "The Communist Party Dissolution Act 1950 held beyond power of the Parliament and invalid. It is not supported by the express incidental power read with the executive power of the Constitution or under an implied nationhood power. The Act does not prescribe any rule of conduct or prohibit specific acts or omissions by way of attack or subversion, but deal directly with bodies and persons named and described. "The stream cannot rise above the source", or, "The Parliament cannot recite itself into power" the Parliament itself purports to determine, or empower the Executive to determine, the very facts upon which the existence of the power depends.".
- Australian_Competition_and_Consumer_Commission_v_Baxter_Healthcare opinions "Derivative governmental immunity covers persons other than the government where applying the statute to those persons would have the effect of divesting the government of proprietary, contractual, or other legal rights or interests".
- Australian_Competition_and_Consumer_Commission_v_Baxter_Healthcare opinions "The immunity of governments from the restrictive trade practices provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 does not extend to trading corporations that provide goods or services to the government".
- Australian_Tape_Manufacturers_Association_Ltd_v_Commonwealth opinions "The fee imposed was a tax pursuant to section 51".
- Autoclenz_Ltd_v_Belcher opinions "Lord Clarke".
- Azmi_v_Kirklees_Metropolitan_Borough_Council opinions "Wilkie J".
- BMG_Music_v._Gonzalez opinions "where user of file-sharing software downloaded over 1,000 copyrighted songs without authority of copyright holders, court rejected fair use to defense to claim for copyright infringement based on user's contention that she was merely "sampling" the works for possible future purchase".
- Baehr_v._Miike opinions "Passage of a state constitutional amendment empowering the state legislature to limit marriage to mixed-sex couples renders plaintiff-appellees' case moot. Circuit court reversed and remanded to enter judgment for defendant-appellant.".
- Bairstow_v_Queen's_Moat_Houses_plc opinions "Robert Walker LJ".
- Baker_v._Vermont opinions "Majority: Amestoy".
- Baker_v._Wade opinions "The right to privacy does not cover acts of homosexual sodomy. The Texas sodomy law does not violate due process.".
- Baldwin_v_Brighton_City_Council opinions "Judge Peter Clark".
- Balfour_v_Balfour opinions "Warrington LJ, Duke LJ and Atkin LJ".
- Bank_of_New_South_Wales_v_Commonwealth opinions "Nationalisation of private banking amounts to a violation of an individual right to engage in particular types of trading and commercial activity under s 92. Failure to provide for the provision of interest on compensation makes the acquisition of bank shares and business and acquisition in violation of the protection provided by pl..".
- Barnes_v_Addy opinions "Lord Selbourne LC".
- Barron_v_Potter opinions "Warrington J".
- Barton_v_Armstrong opinions "Lord Cross, Lord Wilberforce, Lord Simon".
- Bath_v_Alston_Holdings_Pty_Ltd opinions "The retail fee in question was found to be discriminatory and protectionist in relation to interstate trade".
- Beck_v._Eiland-Hall opinions d2009-1182.html.
- Belchier_v_Parsons opinions Philip_Yorke,_1st_Earl_of_Hardwicke.
- Bell_v._State opinions 13914.
- Berkey_v._Third_Avenue_Railway_Co opinions "Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo".
- Bernstein_v._United_States opinions "Concurrence by Bright".
- Bernstein_v._United_States opinions "Dissent by Nelson".
- Bernstein_v._United_States opinions "Opinion by Fletcher".
- Beswick_v_Beswick opinions Christopher_Guest,_Baron_Guest.
- Beswick_v_Beswick opinions Edward_Pearce,_Baron_Pearce.
- Beswick_v_Beswick opinions Gerald_Upjohn,_Baron_Upjohn.
- Beswick_v_Beswick opinions James_Reid,_Baron_Reid.
- Betfair_Pty_Limited_v_Western_Australia opinions "The 2007 amendments to Betting Control Act 1954 which prevented interstate betting exchange operators from conducting business in Western Australia were invalid under s 92 of the Australian Constitution".
- Bhullar_v_Bhullar opinions "Jonathan Parker LJ".
- Bishop_v._Aronov opinions "Floyd R. Gibson".
- Blakey_v._Continental_Airlines opinions "Majority: O'Hern".
- Bloomberg_L.P._v._Board_of_Governors_of_the_Federal_Reserve_System opinions "#97945".
- Bolton_v_Madsen opinions "The broad approach and the criterion of liability approach to excise were approved".
- Bond_v_The_Queen opinions "' The authority contained in s17 of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1983 did not give the Commonwealth DPP the power to institute appeals in state courts. ( ) ' The common law principles relating to the validity of acts done by an invalidly appointed public officer had no application. ( )".
- Bosnian_Genocide_Case opinions "The Court affirms that it has jurisdiction; Serbia has not committed genocide; Serbia has not conspired to commit genocide, nor incited the commission of genocide; Serbia has not been complicit in genocide; Serbia has violated the obligation to prevent the Srebrenica genocide; Serbia has violated its obligations under the Genocide Convention by having failed to transfer Ratko Mladić to ICTY; Serbia has violated its obligation to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the Court".
- Boub_v._Township_of_Wayne opinions "Municipalities are not liable for the damages that cyclist suffer on the roads".
- Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co. opinions "The court ruled that plaintiffs had no reasonable expectation of privacy, and therefore employer had right to monitor employee's E-mail and to terminate employees for using company E-mail system for personal use.".
- Breckland_Group_Holdings_Ltd_v_London_and_Suffolk_Properties opinions "Harmen J".
- Breskvar_v_Wall opinions "7".
- Brewbaker_v._Regents opinions "Majority: Judge Vogel".
- Bridgeman_Art_Library_v._Corel_Corp. opinions "Photographic reproductions of visual works in the public domain were not copyrightable because the reproductions involved no originality. Upon reconsideration and reargument, judgment was again entered for defendants.".
- Bridgeport_Music,_Inc._v._Dimension_Films opinions "district court erroneously granted summary judgment for defendant on claim for copyright infringement based on fact that defendant's copying of plaintiff's copyrighted sound recording was merely de minimis. Court of Appeals rejects de minimis defense to claim for copyright infringement of a sound recording.".
- Bristol_and_West_Building_Society_v_Mothew opinions "Millett LJ".
- British_Crane_Hire_Corporation_Ltd_v_Ipswich_Plant_Hire_Ltd opinions Alfred_Denning,_Baron_Denning.
- British_Crane_Hire_Corporation_Ltd_v_Ipswich_Plant_Hire_Ltd opinions Master_of_the_Rolls.
- British_Eagle_International_Airlines_Ltd_v_Compagnie_Nationale_Air_France opinions "Lord Cross, Lord Morris".
- British_Steel_Corp_v_Cleveland_Bridge_and_Engineering_Co_Ltd opinions "Robert Goff J".
- British_Westinghouse_Electric_and_Manufacturing_Co_Ltd_v_Underground_Electric_Railways_Co_of_London_Ltd opinions "Viscount Haldane LC".
- Broderbund_v._Unison opinions "Defendant adjudged to have infringed the copyright of plaintiff on the audiovisual displays of the computer program.".
- Bunge_Corporation_v_Tradax_SA opinions "Lord Wilberforce, Lord Scarman, Lord Lowry, Lord Roskill".
- Bunning_v_Cross opinions "Improperly or illegally obtained does not inherently render it inadmissible; however, it confers upon a judge a discretion to reject it .".
- Burger_King_Corporation_v_Hungry_Jack's opinions "* Hungry Jack's breach of clause 2.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract, because clause 2.1 was not an essential term * clause 15.1 did not give Burger King a right to terminate the contract * Burger King was in breach of an implied term of good faith".
- Burgess_v_Rawnsley opinions "Lord Denning MR".
- Burnie_Port_Authority_v_General_Jones_Pty_Ltd opinions "Authority liable to General Jones under ordinary principles of negligence; appeal dismissed.".
- Byron_v._Rajneesh_Foundation_International opinions "Jury award to Byron.".
- Byron_v._Rajneesh_Foundation_International opinions "Subsequent motions denied.".