Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Defendant was charged with importing heroin. A federal magistrate conducted jury selection, and defendant acquiesced, raising no objection in the district court. On appeal, he contended that the magistrate's conducting jury selection violated his rights under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The Second Circuit disagreed, and the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari.. }
Showing items 1 to 1 of
1
with 100 items per page.
- Peretz_v._United_States prior "Defendant was charged with importing heroin. A federal magistrate conducted jury selection, and defendant acquiesced, raising no objection in the district court. On appeal, he contended that the magistrate's conducting jury selection violated his rights under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The Second Circuit disagreed, and the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari.".