Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Peretz_v._United_States> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 items per page.
- Peretz_v._United_States abstract "Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991) was a Supreme Court of the United States case. The Court affirmed that a defendant in a federal criminal trial on a felony charge must affirmatively object to the supervising of jury selection by a magistrate judge, ruling that it is not enough that the defendant merely acquiesce to the magistrate's involvement in his case for a court to reverse a conviction for this reason.The facts of the case are straightforward. Peretz and a co-defendant had been indicted on smuggling four kilograms of heroin into the United States. The district judge who oversaw the trial asked if there was any objection to a magistrate conducting the jury selection, and Peretz did not make an objection. The district judge conducted the actual trial. Peretz did not object to the magistrate conducting the jury selection until he reached the court of appeals. The court of appeals disagreed, reasoning that the Federal Magistrates Act required him to object specifically to the involvement of a magistrate judge in his case. Since Peretz had not objected in the district court to the magistrate's involvement in the jury selection, he had waived the objection.".
- Peretz_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink 923.html.
- Peretz_v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink 90-615.ZS.html.
- Peretz_v._United_States wikiPageID "6269655".
- Peretz_v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "493405593".
- Peretz_v._United_States arguedate "--04-23".
- Peretz_v._United_States argueyear "1991".
- Peretz_v._United_States decidedate "--06-27".
- Peretz_v._United_States decideyear "1991".
- Peretz_v._United_States dissent "Marshall".
- Peretz_v._United_States dissent "Scalia".
- Peretz_v._United_States fullname "Peretz v. United States of America".
- Peretz_v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Peretz_v._United_States.
- Peretz_v._United_States holding "If the parties consent, Article III and the Federal Magistrates Act allow a district court to delegate to a magistrate judge the responsibility for managing jury selection in a felony trial.".
- Peretz_v._United_States joindissent "Blackmun, White".
- Peretz_v._United_States joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter".
- Peretz_v._United_States lawsapplied "U.S. Const. art. III, Federal Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636".
- Peretz_v._United_States litigants "Peretz v. United States".
- Peretz_v._United_States majority "Stevens".
- Peretz_v._United_States prior "Defendant was charged with importing heroin. A federal magistrate conducted jury selection, and defendant acquiesced, raising no objection in the district court. On appeal, he contended that the magistrate's conducting jury selection violated his rights under Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The Second Circuit disagreed, and the Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari.".
- Peretz_v._United_States scotus "1990".
- Peretz_v._United_States uspage "923".
- Peretz_v._United_States usvol "501".
- Peretz_v._United_States subject Category:1991_in_United_States_case_law.
- Peretz_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Constitution_Article_Three_case_law.
- Peretz_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Peretz_v._United_States subject Category:United_States_criminal_procedure_case_law.
- Peretz_v._United_States type Case.
- Peretz_v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Peretz_v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Peretz_v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Peretz_v._United_States type Event.
- Peretz_v._United_States type Situation.
- Peretz_v._United_States comment "Peretz v. United States, 501 U.S. 923 (1991) was a Supreme Court of the United States case. The Court affirmed that a defendant in a federal criminal trial on a felony charge must affirmatively object to the supervising of jury selection by a magistrate judge, ruling that it is not enough that the defendant merely acquiesce to the magistrate's involvement in his case for a court to reverse a conviction for this reason.The facts of the case are straightforward.".
- Peretz_v._United_States label "Peretz v. United States".
- Peretz_v._United_States sameAs m.0fzv9w.
- Peretz_v._United_States sameAs Q7167903.
- Peretz_v._United_States sameAs Q7167903.
- Peretz_v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Peretz_v._United_States?oldid=493405593.
- Peretz_v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Peretz_v._United_States.
- Peretz_v._United_States name "Peretz v. United States of America".