Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { ?s ?p Fernandez v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1126, was a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonably purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.. }
Showing items 1 to 2 of
2
with 100 items per page.
- Fernandez_v._California abstract "Fernandez v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1126, was a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonably purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.".
- Fernandez_v._California comment "Fernandez v. California, 134 S. Ct. 1126, was a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that explored the limits of Georgia v. Randolph, a 2006 case that held that consent to search a dwelling is invalid in the presence of an objecting co-resident. Fernandez, however, held that when the objecting co-resident is removed for objectively reasonably purposes (such as lawful arrest), the remaining resident may validly consent to search.".