Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 items per page.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion abstract "AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 321 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of Discover Bank v. Superior Court. By permitting contracts that exclude class action arbitration, the high court's decision will make it much harder for consumers to file class action lawsuits.".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion wikiPageID "29528495".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion wikiPageRevisionID "603443748".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion arguedate "--11-09".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion argueyear "2010".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion concurrence "Thomas".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion decidedate "--04-27".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion decideyear "2011".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion dissent "Breyer".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion docket "9".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion fullname "AT&T Mobility LLC, Petitioner v. Vincent Concepcion, et ux.".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion hasPhotoCollection AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion holding "The Discover Bank test adopted by California to invalidate certain arbitration agreements with class action waivers is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion joindissent "Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion joinmajority "Roberts, Kennedy, Thomas, Alito".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion lawsapplied Federal_Arbitration_Act.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion litigants "AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion majority "Scalia".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion parallelcitations "131".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion prior "25920.0".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion scotus "2010".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion uspage "321".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion usvol "563".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion subject Category:AT&T_litigation.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion subject Category:United_States_arbitration_case_law.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion subject Category:United_States_class_action_case_law.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion type Case.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion type LegalCase.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion type UnitOfWork.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion type Situation.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion comment "AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 321 (2011), is a legal dispute that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. On April 27, 2011, the Court ruled, by a 5–4 margin, that the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 preempts state laws that prohibit contracts from disallowing class-wide arbitration, such as the law previously upheld by the California Supreme Court in the case of Discover Bank v. Superior Court.".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion label "AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion".
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion sameAs m.0drzn4g.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion sameAs Q4654543.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion sameAs Q4654543.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion wasDerivedFrom AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion?oldid=603443748.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion isPrimaryTopicOf AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion.
- AT&T_Mobility_v._Concepcion name "AT&T Mobility LLC, Petitioner v. Vincent Concepcion, et ux.".