Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 29 of
29
with 100 items per page.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization abstract "Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208 was a California Supreme Court case, in which the Amador Valley Joint Union High School District challenged the constitutionality of California's Proposition 13, which placed a cap on property taxes. The proposition limited property tax assessments to the 1975 standard, eliminating $7 billion of the $11.4 billion in property tax revenue collected each year. According to the Washington Post, the "severe" limitations this imposed on state funding forced local governments and most school districts in California to make "drastic cutbacks." The district held that the measure was "so drastic and far-reaching that it was 'a revision' of the state Constitution and not a mere amendment." Ultimately, the district was unsuccessful in its suit. In the ruling written by Justice Frank K. Richardson, the Supreme Court distinguished between "amendment" and "revision." The Court confirmed that an initiative cannot "revise" the constitution; Proposition 13, however, was an amendment to the California Constitution and not a "revision." In 2009, Amador Valley was cited by dissenting Justice Carlos R. Moreno in arguing the non-constitutionality of Proposition 8.".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization wikiPageID "25338279".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization wikiPageRevisionID "561300478".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization argueyear "1978".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges Frank_C._Newman.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges Frank_K._Richardson.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges Mathew_Tobriner.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges Stanley_Mosk.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges Wiley_Manuel.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization associatejudges William_P._Clark,_Jr..
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization chiefjudge Rose_Bird.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization citations "17280.0".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization dissent "Bird".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization decideyear "1978".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization fullname "Amador Valley Joint Union High School District et al., Petitioners, v. State Board of Equalization et al., Respondents. County of Alameda et al., Petitioners, v. State Board of Equalization et al., Respondents. City and County of San Francisco et al., Petitioners, v. Joseph E. Tinney, as Tax Assessor, etc., et al., Respondents".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization hasPhotoCollection Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization holding "The court confirmed that an initiative may not "revise" California's constitution; however, the Prop 13 did not amount to a revision but an amendment.".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization joinmajority "Tobriner, Mosk, Clark, Manuel, Newman".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization lawsapplied Constitution_of_California.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization litigants "Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Equalization".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization majority "Richardson".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization subject Category:California_state_case_law.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization comment "Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Equalization (1978) 22 Cal.3d 208 was a California Supreme Court case, in which the Amador Valley Joint Union High School District challenged the constitutionality of California's Proposition 13, which placed a cap on property taxes. The proposition limited property tax assessments to the 1975 standard, eliminating $7 billion of the $11.4 billion in property tax revenue collected each year.".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization label "Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of Equalization".
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization sameAs m.09gqnxr.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization sameAs Q4739081.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization sameAs Q4739081.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization wasDerivedFrom Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization?oldid=561300478.
- Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization isPrimaryTopicOf Amador_Valley_Joint_Union_High_School_District_v._State_Board_of_Equalization.