Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 items per page.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona abstract "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising by lawyers, rejecting it as an antiquated rule of etiquette. The Court emphasized the benefits of the information that flows to consumers through advertising, positing that lawyer advertising would make legal services more accessible to the general public and improve the overall administration of justice. The Court had previously held in Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council that advertising by pharmacists regarding the price of prescription drugs was commercial speech protected by the First Amendment.".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&vol=433&invol=350.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageExternalLink USSC_CR_0433_0350_ZS.html.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageExternalLink 1976_76_316.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageID "15565456".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wikiPageRevisionID "580058045".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona arguedate "--01-18".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona argueyear "1977".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona case "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona dissent "Burger".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona dissent "Powell".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona decidedate "--06-27".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona decideyear "1977".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona dissent "Rehnquist".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona findlaw getcase.pl?court=US&vol=433&invol=350.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona fullname "John R. Bates and Van O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona hasPhotoCollection Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona holding "The First Amendment allows lawyers to advertise in a manner that is not misleading to members of the general public.".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona dissent "Stewart".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona joinmajority "Brennan, White, Marshall, Stevens".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona justia case.html.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona lawsapplied First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona litigants "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona majority "Blackmun".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona otherSource "Cornell LII".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona otherUrl USSC_CR_0433_0350_ZS.html.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona prior "17280.0".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona scotus "1975".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona uspage "350".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona usvol "433".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona subject Category:1977_in_United_States_case_law.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona subject Category:American_Bar_Association.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona subject Category:United_States_commercial_speech_case_law.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona subject Category:United_States_professional_responsibility_case_law.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type Case.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type LegalCase.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type UnitOfWork.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type Event.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona type Situation.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona comment "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the right of lawyers to advertise their services. In holding that lawyer advertising was commercial speech entitled to protection under the First Amendment (incorporated against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment), the Court upset the tradition against advertising by lawyers, rejecting it as an antiquated rule of etiquette.".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona label "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona".
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona sameAs m.03mf8pp.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona sameAs Q4868831.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona sameAs Q4868831.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona wasDerivedFrom Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona?oldid=580058045.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona isPrimaryTopicOf Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona.
- Bates_v._State_Bar_of_Arizona name "John R. Bates and Van O'Steen v. State Bar of Arizona".