Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bennis_v._Michigan> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- Bennis_v._Michigan abstract "Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.Tina B. Bennis was a joint owner, with her husband, of an automobile in which her husband engaged in sexual activity with a prostitute. In declaring the automobile forfeit as a public nuisance under Michigan's statutory abatement scheme, the trial court permitted no offset for petitioner's interest, notwithstanding her lack of knowledge of her husband's activity. The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed, but was in turn reversed by the State Supreme Court, which concluded, among other things, that Michigan's failure to provide an innocent-owner defense was without federal constitutional consequence under this Court's decisions.".
- Bennis_v._Michigan wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=516&page=442.
- Bennis_v._Michigan wikiPageExternalLink 94-8729.ZS.html.
- Bennis_v._Michigan wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Bennis_v._Michigan wikiPageID "18492986".
- Bennis_v._Michigan wikiPageRevisionID "603457463".
- Bennis_v._Michigan arguedate "--11-29".
- Bennis_v._Michigan argueyear "1995".
- Bennis_v._Michigan case "Bennis v. Michigan".
- Bennis_v._Michigan citation "116".
- Bennis_v._Michigan cornell 94-8729.ZS.html.
- Bennis_v._Michigan decidedate "--03-04".
- Bennis_v._Michigan decideyear "1996".
- Bennis_v._Michigan dissent "Kennedy".
- Bennis_v._Michigan dissent "Stevens".
- Bennis_v._Michigan findlaw getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=516&page=442.
- Bennis_v._Michigan fullname "Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan".
- Bennis_v._Michigan hasPhotoCollection Bennis_v._Michigan.
- Bennis_v._Michigan holding "The forfeiture order did not offend the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.".
- Bennis_v._Michigan joindissent "Souter, Breyer".
- Bennis_v._Michigan joinmajority "O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg".
- Bennis_v._Michigan justia case.html.
- Bennis_v._Michigan litigants "Bennis v. Michigan".
- Bennis_v._Michigan majority "Rehnquist".
- Bennis_v._Michigan prior "Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan".
- Bennis_v._Michigan scotus "1994".
- Bennis_v._Michigan uspage "442".
- Bennis_v._Michigan usvol "516".
- Bennis_v._Michigan subject Category:1996_in_United_States_case_law.
- Bennis_v._Michigan subject Category:Takings_Clause_case_law.
- Bennis_v._Michigan subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Bennis_v._Michigan subject Category:United_States_civil_forfeiture_case_law.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type Case.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type LegalCase.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type UnitOfWork.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type Event.
- Bennis_v._Michigan type Situation.
- Bennis_v._Michigan comment "Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.Tina B. Bennis was a joint owner, with her husband, of an automobile in which her husband engaged in sexual activity with a prostitute.".
- Bennis_v._Michigan label "Bennis v. Michigan".
- Bennis_v._Michigan sameAs m.04dyxcq.
- Bennis_v._Michigan sameAs Q4889899.
- Bennis_v._Michigan sameAs Q4889899.
- Bennis_v._Michigan wasDerivedFrom Bennis_v._Michigan?oldid=603457463.
- Bennis_v._Michigan isPrimaryTopicOf Bennis_v._Michigan.
- Bennis_v._Michigan name "Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan".