Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 16 of
16
with 100 items per page.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower abstract "Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226, is a landmark decision handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse.".
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower wikiPageID "2487302".
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower wikiPageRevisionID "583403040".
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower hasPhotoCollection Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower subject Category:2003_in_LGBT_history.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower subject Category:2003_in_New_Hampshire.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower subject Category:2003_in_United_States_case_law.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower subject Category:New_Hampshire_state_case_law.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower subject Category:United_States_LGBT_rights_case_law.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower comment "Blanchflower v. Blanchflower, 150 N.H. 226, is a landmark decision handed down by the New Hampshire Supreme Court which ruled that sexual relations between two females, one of whom is married, does not constitute adultery because it is not technically sexual intercourse.".
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower label "Blanchflower v. Blanchflower".
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower sameAs m.07hb71.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower sameAs Q4924923.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower sameAs Q4924923.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower wasDerivedFrom Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower?oldid=583403040.
- Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower isPrimaryTopicOf Blanchflower_v._Blanchflower.