Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bunting_v._Oregon> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 items per page.
- Bunting_v._Oregon abstract "Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 (1917), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a ten-hour work day. The trials of Bunting v. Oregon resulted in acceptance of a ten-hour workday for both men and women, but the state minimum-wage laws weren't changed until twenty years later. Future Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter along with future Oregon Supreme Court justices George M. Brown and John O. Bailey represented Oregon on the appeal while W. Lair Thompson and former Senator for Oregon Charles W. Fulton represented Bunting.".
- Bunting_v._Oregon wikiPageID "8222061".
- Bunting_v._Oregon wikiPageRevisionID "603748501".
- Bunting_v._Oregon arguedate "--04-18".
- Bunting_v._Oregon argueyear "1916".
- Bunting_v._Oregon citation "37".
- Bunting_v._Oregon decidedate "--04-09".
- Bunting_v._Oregon decideyear "1917".
- Bunting_v._Oregon dissent "McReynolds".
- Bunting_v._Oregon dissent "Van Devanter".
- Bunting_v._Oregon dissent "White".
- Bunting_v._Oregon fullname "Franklin O. Bunting, Plaintiff in Error v. The State of Oregon".
- Bunting_v._Oregon hasPhotoCollection Bunting_v._Oregon.
- Bunting_v._Oregon holding "No. The court affirmed the decision of the Oregon Supreme Court upholding the state law as constitutional.".
- Bunting_v._Oregon joinmajority "Holmes, Day, Pitney, Clarke".
- Bunting_v._Oregon litigants "Bunting v. Oregon".
- Bunting_v._Oregon majority "McKenna".
- Bunting_v._Oregon notparticipating "Brandeis".
- Bunting_v._Oregon prior "71".
- Bunting_v._Oregon rearguedate "--01-19".
- Bunting_v._Oregon reargueyear "1917".
- Bunting_v._Oregon scotus "1916".
- Bunting_v._Oregon uspage "426".
- Bunting_v._Oregon usvol "243".
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:1917_in_United_States_case_law.
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:History_of_women's_rights_in_the_United_States.
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:Legal_history_of_Oregon.
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:United_States_labor_case_law.
- Bunting_v._Oregon subject Category:Working_time.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type Case.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type LegalCase.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type UnitOfWork.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type Event.
- Bunting_v._Oregon type Situation.
- Bunting_v._Oregon comment "Bunting v. Oregon, 243 U.S. 426 (1917), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a ten-hour work day. The trials of Bunting v. Oregon resulted in acceptance of a ten-hour workday for both men and women, but the state minimum-wage laws weren't changed until twenty years later. Future Supreme Court justice Felix Frankfurter along with future Oregon Supreme Court justices George M. Brown and John O. Bailey represented Oregon on the appeal while W.".
- Bunting_v._Oregon label "Bunting v. Oregon".
- Bunting_v._Oregon sameAs m.026wpws.
- Bunting_v._Oregon sameAs Q4997934.
- Bunting_v._Oregon sameAs Q4997934.
- Bunting_v._Oregon wasDerivedFrom Bunting_v._Oregon?oldid=603748501.
- Bunting_v._Oregon isPrimaryTopicOf Bunting_v._Oregon.
- Bunting_v._Oregon name "Franklin O. Bunting, Plaintiff in Error v. The State of Oregon".