Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 items per page.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago abstract "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), incorporated the takings clause of the 5th Amendment into the due process clause of the 14th Amendment by requiring states to provide just compensation for seizing private property. This was the first Supreme Court case that incorporated an amendment of the Bill of Rights and applied it to a state or local government. Prior to this case, the Bill of Rights was considered to only apply to the federal government.".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&vol=166&invol=226.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wikiPageExternalLink Takings.html.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wikiPageExternalLink 1896_129.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wikiPageID "27838149".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wikiPageRevisionID "605748580".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago arguedatea "--11-06".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago arguedateb "--11-09".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago argueyear "1896".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago citation "166".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago decidedate "--03-01".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago decideyear "1897".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago dissent "Brewer".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago fullname "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago holding "The 14th Amendment's due process clause requires that states provide fair compensation for seizing private property.".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago joinmajority "Field, Gray, Brown, Shiras, White, Peckham".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago litigants "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago majority "Harlan".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago scotus "1896".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago uspage "226".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago usvol "166".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago subject Category:1897_in_United_States_case_law.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago subject Category:Chicago,_Burlington_and_Quincy_Railroad.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago subject Category:Incorporation_case_law.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago subject Category:Takings_Clause_case_law.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago type Case.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago type LegalCase.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago type UnitOfWork.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago type Situation.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago comment "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), incorporated the takings clause of the 5th Amendment into the due process clause of the 14th Amendment by requiring states to provide just compensation for seizing private property. This was the first Supreme Court case that incorporated an amendment of the Bill of Rights and applied it to a state or local government. Prior to this case, the Bill of Rights was considered to only apply to the federal government.".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago label "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago".
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago sameAs m.0cc95k3.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago sameAs Q5095400.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago sameAs Q5095400.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago wasDerivedFrom Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago?oldid=605748580.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago isPrimaryTopicOf Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago.
- Chicago,_Burlington_&_Quincy_Railroad_Co._v._City_of_Chicago name "Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago".