Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond abstract "City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the power of law enforcement to conduct suspicionless searches, specifically, using drug-sniffing dogs at roadblocks. Previous Supreme Court decisions had given the police power to create roadblocks for the purposes of border security (United States v. Martinez-Fuerte), and removing drunk drivers from the road (Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz). This decision stated that the power was limited to situations in which the search was "designed to serve special needs, beyond the normal need for law enforcement."The Court drew a line on check point programs that followed Police v. Sitz (1990) "whose primary purpose" is "to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing". The Court refused to "credit the 'general interest in crime control' as justification for a regime of suspicionless stops."The opinion was delivered by Justice O'Connor, joined by Justices Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer.Chief Justice Rehnquist delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Thomas joined, and Justice Scalia joined as to part I.Justice Thomas also filed a separate dissent.".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond wikiPageID "3449950".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond wikiPageRevisionID "599854269".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond arguedate "--10-03".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond argueyear "2000".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond citation "172800.0".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond decidedate "--11-28".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond decideyear "2000".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond dissent "Rehnquist".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond dissent "Thomas".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond fullname "City of Indianapolis, et al. v. James Edmond, et al.".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond hasPhotoCollection City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond holding "Police may not conduct roadblocks "whose primary purpose is to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing." Such roadblocks must have a specific primary purpose, such as keeping roadways safe from impaired drivers, or enforcing border security.".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond joindissent "Thomas; Scalia".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond joinmajority "Stevens, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond lawsapplied United_States_Constitution.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond litigants "City of Indianapolis v. Edmond".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond majority "O'Connor".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond prior "On writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond scotus "1994".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond uspage "32".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond usvol "531".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:2000_in_United_States_case_law.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:Federal_court_cases_involving_the_State_of_Indiana.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:Government_of_Indianapolis,_Indiana.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type Case.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type LegalCase.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type UnitOfWork.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type Event.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond type Situation.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond comment "City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States limited the power of law enforcement to conduct suspicionless searches, specifically, using drug-sniffing dogs at roadblocks. Previous Supreme Court decisions had given the police power to create roadblocks for the purposes of border security (United States v. Martinez-Fuerte), and removing drunk drivers from the road (Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz).".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond label "City of Indianapolis v. Edmond".
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond sameAs m.09d1nt.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond sameAs Q5123726.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond sameAs Q5123726.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond wasDerivedFrom City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond?oldid=599854269.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond isPrimaryTopicOf City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond.
- City_of_Indianapolis_v._Edmond name "City of Indianapolis, et al. v. James Edmond, et al.".