Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Colegrove_v._Green> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 items per page.
- Colegrove_v._Green abstract "Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case. Writing for a 4-3 plurality, Justice Felix Frankfurter held that the federal judiciary had no power to interfere with issues regarding apportionment of state legislatures. The Court held that Article I, section IV of the U.S. Constitution left to the legislature of each state the authority to establish the time, place, and manner of holding elections for representatives, and that only Congress (and thus not the federal judiciary) could determine whether individual state legislatures had fulfilled their responsibility to secure fair representation for citizens.The Colegrove decision would later be relegated to near irrelevancy by Baker v. Carr.".
- Colegrove_v._Green wikiPageID "18774108".
- Colegrove_v._Green wikiPageRevisionID "480274193".
- Colegrove_v._Green arguedatea "--03-07".
- Colegrove_v._Green arguedateb "--03-08".
- Colegrove_v._Green argueyear "1946".
- Colegrove_v._Green concurrence "Rutledge".
- Colegrove_v._Green decidedate "--06-10".
- Colegrove_v._Green decideyear "1946".
- Colegrove_v._Green dissent "Black".
- Colegrove_v._Green fullname "Colegrove et al. v. Green et al.".
- Colegrove_v._Green hasPhotoCollection Colegrove_v._Green.
- Colegrove_v._Green holding "The remedy for unfairness in districting is to secure State legislatures that will apportion properly, or to invoke the ample powers of Congress. The Constitution has many commands that are not enforceable by courts, because they clearly fall outside the conditions and purposes that circumscribe judicial action.".
- Colegrove_v._Green joindissent "Douglas, Murphy".
- Colegrove_v._Green joinmajority "Reed, Burton".
- Colegrove_v._Green lawsapplied Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Colegrove_v._Green litigants "Colegrove v. Green".
- Colegrove_v._Green majority "Frankfurter".
- Colegrove_v._Green notparticipating "Jackson".
- Colegrove_v._Green overruled "Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186".
- Colegrove_v._Green prior "Dismissed, 64 F.Supp. 632".
- Colegrove_v._Green scotus "1945".
- Colegrove_v._Green uspage "549".
- Colegrove_v._Green usvol "328".
- Colegrove_v._Green subject Category:Lawsuits.
- Colegrove_v._Green subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Colegrove_v._Green subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Colegrove_v._Green subject Category:United_States_political_question_doctrine_case_law.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Abstraction100002137.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Act100030358.
- Colegrove_v._Green type DueProcess101181475.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Event100029378.
- Colegrove_v._Green type GroupAction101080366.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Lawsuit101182654.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Lawsuits.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Proceeding101184814.
- Colegrove_v._Green type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Colegrove_v._Green type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Case.
- Colegrove_v._Green type LegalCase.
- Colegrove_v._Green type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Colegrove_v._Green type UnitOfWork.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Event.
- Colegrove_v._Green type Situation.
- Colegrove_v._Green comment "Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946), was a United States Supreme Court case. Writing for a 4-3 plurality, Justice Felix Frankfurter held that the federal judiciary had no power to interfere with issues regarding apportionment of state legislatures. The Court held that Article I, section IV of the U.S.".
- Colegrove_v._Green label "Colegrove v. Green".
- Colegrove_v._Green sameAs m.04gv1j3.
- Colegrove_v._Green sameAs Q5142958.
- Colegrove_v._Green sameAs Q5142958.
- Colegrove_v._Green sameAs Colegrove_v._Green.
- Colegrove_v._Green wasDerivedFrom Colegrove_v._Green?oldid=480274193.
- Colegrove_v._Green isPrimaryTopicOf Colegrove_v._Green.
- Colegrove_v._Green name "Colegrove et al. v. Green et al.".