Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Connecticut_v._Doehr> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr abstract "Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=CASE&court=US&vol=501&page=1.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr wikiPageID "14521398".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr wikiPageRevisionID "583511742".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr arguedate "--01-07".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr argueyear "1991".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr citation "17280.0".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr concurrence "Rehnquist".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr concurrence "Scalia".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr decidedate "--06-06".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr decideyear "1991".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr fullname "Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr hasPhotoCollection Connecticut_v._Doehr.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr holding "A state law authorizing the prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property at the outset of a lawsuit, without notice to the defendant or a hearing and without any showing of extraordinary circumstances, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr joinconcurrence "Blackmun".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr joinmajority "Rehnquist, Blackmun, Marshall, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr litigants "Connecticut v. Doehr".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr majority "White".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr prior "Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr scotus "1990".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr uspage "1".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr usvol "501".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr subject Category:1991_in_Connecticut.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr subject Category:1991_in_United_States_case_law.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr subject Category:Legal_history_of_Connecticut.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type Case.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type LegalCase.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type UnitOfWork.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type Event.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr type Situation.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr comment "Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. 1 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state statute authorizing prejudgment attachment of a defendant's real property upon the filing of an action, without prior notice or hearing, without a showing of extraordinary circumstances, and without a requirement that the plaintiff post a bond, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr label "Connecticut v. Doehr".
- Connecticut_v._Doehr sameAs m.03d676t.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr sameAs Q5161669.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr sameAs Q5161669.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr wasDerivedFrom Connecticut_v._Doehr?oldid=583511742.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr isPrimaryTopicOf Connecticut_v._Doehr.
- Connecticut_v._Doehr name "Connecticut v. Brian K. Doehr".