Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 44 of
44
with 100 items per page.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder abstract "Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder, 557 F.3d 321 (6th Cir. 2009) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the record-keeping provisions of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act did not violate the First Amendment.Section 2257 of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act requires those who create sexually explicit materials to maintain records of their model's age and identities, as a measure against child pornography. Connection Distributing, a publisher of swinging magazines, challenged the constitutionality of the statute, as individuals who posted on Connection's magazines would also be required to create and maintain such records, and provide them to the publisher.In 2009, the Sixth Circuit ruled en banc that the provisions were not unconstitutional, while a panel of the court had decided in 2007 that the statute violated the First Amendment.".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wikiPageExternalLink scholar_case?case=16607053160033199144&q=Connection+Distributing+Co.+v.+Holder&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wikiPageExternalLink 2008-1449.resp.pdf.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wikiPageExternalLink connection-distributing-co-v-holder.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wikiPageID "41858111".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wikiPageRevisionID "602306364".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder arguedate "--09-10".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder argueyear "2008".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder case "Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder citations "25920.0".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder court "United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder courtlistener connection-distributing-co-v-holder.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder courtseal "150".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder decidedate "--02-20".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder decideyear "2009".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder dissent "Clay".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder dissent "Kennedy".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder dissent "Moore".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder dissent "White".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder fullname "Connection Distributing Co.; Rondee Kamins; Jane Doe; John Doe v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder holding "The court held that the record-keeping requirements of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act did not violate the First Amendment.".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder joindissent "Martin, Cole".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder joindissent "Martin, Moore, Cole, Clay, White".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder joinmajority "Boggs, Batchelder, Daughtrey, Gilman, Gibbons, Rogers, Cook, McKeague, Griffin, Kethledge".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder judges "Danny Julian Boggs, Cornelia Groefsema Kennedy, Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Alice M. Batchelder, Martha Craig Daughtrey, Karen Nelson Moore, R. Guy Cole, Jr., Eric L. Clay, Ronald Lee Gilman, Julia Smith Gibbons, John M. Rogers, Jeffrey Sutton, Deborah L. Cook, David McKeague, Richard Allen Griffin, Raymond Kethledge, and Helene White".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder litigants "Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder majority "Sutton".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder otherSource "Google Scholar".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder otherUrl scholar_case?case=16607053160033199144&q=Connection+Distributing+Co.+v.+Holder&hl=en&as_sdt=2006&as_vis=1.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder prior "Summary judgment to the defendant, 95-01993".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder subsequent "--10-05".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder subject Category:2009_in_United_States_case_law.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder subject Category:Overbreadth_case_law.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Sixth_Circuit_cases.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder subject Category:United_States_First_Amendment_case_law.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder comment "Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder, 557 F.3d 321 (6th Cir. 2009) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the record-keeping provisions of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act did not violate the First Amendment.Section 2257 of the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act requires those who create sexually explicit materials to maintain records of their model's age and identities, as a measure against child pornography.".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder label "Connection Distributing Co. v. Holder".
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder sameAs m.0_x59nx.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder sameAs Q16833675.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder sameAs Q16833675.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder wasDerivedFrom Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder?oldid=602306364.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-6thCircuit-Seal.png.
- Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder isPrimaryTopicOf Connection_Distributing_Co._v._Holder.