Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Counselman_v._Hitchcock> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 35 of
35
with 100 items per page.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock abstract "Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then passed the broader "transactional immunity" statute.".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock wikiPageID "29880310".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock wikiPageRevisionID "540430723".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock arguedatea "--12-09".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock arguedateb "10".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock argueyear "1891".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock citation "12".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock decidedate "--01-11".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock decideyear "1892".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock fullname "Counselman v. Hitchcock".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock hasPhotoCollection Counselman_v._Hitchcock.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock joinmajority "unanimous".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock litigants "Counselman v. Hitchcock".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock majority "Blatchford".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock prior "Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock scotus "1891".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock uspage "547".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock usvol "142".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock subject Category:1892_in_United_States_case_law.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock subject Category:Legal_history_of_Illinois.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock subject Category:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_self-incrimination_case_law.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock type Case.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock type LegalCase.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock type UnitOfWork.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock type Situation.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock comment "Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547 (1892), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that not incriminating an individual for testimony was not the same as not requiring them to testify at all. The court reasoned that as long as evidence arising from the compelled testimony could incriminate the individual in any way, the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination was not satisfied. The court then passed the broader "transactional immunity" statute.".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock label "Counselman v. Hitchcock".
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock sameAs m.0fqmh09.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock sameAs Q5176619.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock sameAs Q5176619.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock wasDerivedFrom Counselman_v._Hitchcock?oldid=540430723.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock isPrimaryTopicOf Counselman_v._Hitchcock.
- Counselman_v._Hitchcock name "Counselman v. Hitchcock".