Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Doe_v._Chao> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 items per page.
- Doe_v._Chao abstract "Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted the statutory damages provision of the Privacy Act of 1974. Prior to the case, lower federal courts had split over whether plaintiffs whose rights were violated were automatically entitled to the statutory minimum damages award of $1000, or whether those plaintiffs had to prove that they had suffered at least some actual damage from the privacy breach (which would then be raised to $1000 if their actual damages were less than that). The Court's 6-3 decision determined that the latter interpretation was correct; as a result, it will be more difficult for a plaintiff to prevail as he or she must now prove both a violation and some damages before being entitled to recovery. This result is generally applauded by proponents of greater freedoms for the press, as a contrary result may have made government agencies more reluctant to release information out of fear of lawsuits.".
- Doe_v._Chao wikiPageExternalLink 02-1377.html.
- Doe_v._Chao wikiPageExternalLink 1649.
- Doe_v._Chao wikiPageID "487591".
- Doe_v._Chao wikiPageRevisionID "471631550".
- Doe_v._Chao arguedate "--12-03".
- Doe_v._Chao argueyear "2003".
- Doe_v._Chao citation "172800.0".
- Doe_v._Chao decidedate "--02-24".
- Doe_v._Chao decideyear "2004".
- Doe_v._Chao dissent "Breyer".
- Doe_v._Chao dissent "Ginsburg".
- Doe_v._Chao fullname "Buck Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor".
- Doe_v._Chao hasPhotoCollection Doe_v._Chao.
- Doe_v._Chao holding "Plaintiffs must prove that some actual damages resulted from a federal agency's intentional or willful violation of the Privacy Act of 1974 in order to qualify for the statutory minimum award of $1000 provided for such a violation under that statute. Fourth Circuit affirmed.".
- Doe_v._Chao joindissent "Stevens, Breyer".
- Doe_v._Chao joinmajority "Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas, Scalia".
- Doe_v._Chao lawsapplied "Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. §552a".
- Doe_v._Chao litigants "Doe v. Chao".
- Doe_v._Chao majority "Souter".
- Doe_v._Chao prior "25920.0".
- Doe_v._Chao scotus "1994".
- Doe_v._Chao uspage "614".
- Doe_v._Chao usvol "540".
- Doe_v._Chao subject Category:2004_in_United_States_case_law.
- Doe_v._Chao subject Category:Coal_mining_in_the_United_States.
- Doe_v._Chao subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Doe_v._Chao type Case.
- Doe_v._Chao type LegalCase.
- Doe_v._Chao type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Doe_v._Chao type UnitOfWork.
- Doe_v._Chao type Event.
- Doe_v._Chao type Situation.
- Doe_v._Chao comment "Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614 (2004), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that interpreted the statutory damages provision of the Privacy Act of 1974.".
- Doe_v._Chao label "Doe v. Chao".
- Doe_v._Chao sameAs m.02gf62.
- Doe_v._Chao sameAs Q5288063.
- Doe_v._Chao sameAs Q5288063.
- Doe_v._Chao wasDerivedFrom Doe_v._Chao?oldid=471631550.
- Doe_v._Chao isPrimaryTopicOf Doe_v._Chao.
- Doe_v._Chao name "Buck Doe v. Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor".