Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Doe_v._Shurtleff> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 47 of
47
with 100 items per page.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff abstract "Doe v. Shurtleff, 628 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2010), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit case assessing the constitutionality of Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-21.5, a law that requires sex offenders to register their internet identifiers with the state in order to "assist in investigating kidnapping and sex-related crimes, and in apprehending offenders." In this case, a convicted sex offender, appearing anonymously as John Doe, appealed a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Utah to vacate an order enjoining the enforcement of Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-21.5. Even though Doe did not dispute the state's interest in enacting such a statute, he believed that the statute's enforcement ran afoul of his: First Amendment right to engage in anonymous speech; Fourth Amendment rights to privacy and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure; and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution.Upon examining Doe's appeal, the Tenth Circuit determined that Utah's registration statute did not violate Doe's First or Fourth Amendment rights or the Ex Post Facto Clause, and therefore affirmed the lower court's decision to lift the injunction.".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-10thCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 1292086.html.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 1308994.html.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 0.pdf?1270223573.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink statute-requiring-sex-offender-internet-identifier-registry-held-constitutional.html.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 77_27_002105.htm.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 27790.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink rule_60.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 93-986.ZO.html.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink 96-511.ZS.html.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageExternalLink section.jsp?code=63G-2.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageID "34845240".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wikiPageRevisionID "549699807".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff align "left".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff bgcolor "#F9F9F9".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff border "0.8".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff citations "25920.0".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff court "United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff courtseal "150".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff decidedate "--10-26".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff decideyear "2010".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff fontsize "75".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff fullname "John Doe v. Mark Shurtleff".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff hasPhotoCollection Doe_v._Shurtleff.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff holding "Affirmed District Court decision. Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-21.5, a Utah statute requiring convicted sex offenders to register their online identifiers, does not violate the First or Fourth Amendments or the Ex Post Facto Clause.".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff judges Monroe_G._McKay.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff judges Neil_Gorsuch.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff judges Richard_Dickson_Cudahy.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff lawsapplied "Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-21.5, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Ex Post Facto Clause".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff litigants "Doe v. Shurtleff".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff majority Monroe_G._McKay.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff quote "The [state], to assist in investigating kidnapping and sex-related crimes, and in apprehending offenders, shall: develop and operate a system to collect, analyze, maintain, and disseminate information on offenders and sex and kidnap offenses; make information listed in Subsection available to the public [Subsection 27 contains a list of specific types of information, including the offender's physical address, physical description and vehicle license plate number, that must be made publicly available - it specifically excludes internet identifiers]; and share information provided by an offender under this section that may not be made available to the public under Subsection , but only: : for the purposes under this Subsection ; or : in accordance with [the Utah Government Records Access and Management Act].".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff source "Utah Code Ann. § 77-27-21.5".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff subject Category:2010_in_United_States_case_law.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff subject Category:Internet_privacy_case_law.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Tenth_Circuit_cases.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff subject Category:United_States_privacy_case_law.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff comment "Doe v. Shurtleff, 628 F.3d 1217 (10th Cir. 2010), was a United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit case assessing the constitutionality of Utah Code Ann.".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff label "Doe v. Shurtleff".
- Doe_v._Shurtleff sameAs m.0j44hqg.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff sameAs Q5288069.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff sameAs Q5288069.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff wasDerivedFrom Doe_v._Shurtleff?oldid=549699807.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-10thCircuit-Seal.png.
- Doe_v._Shurtleff isPrimaryTopicOf Doe_v._Shurtleff.
