Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Easley_v._Cromartie> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 48 of
48
with 100 items per page.
- Easley_v._Cromartie abstract "Easley v. Cromartie, 532 US 234 (2001), also known as Hunt v. Cromartie, was a U.S. Supreme Court case. The court's ruling on April 18, 2001 stated that redistricting for political reasons did not violate Federal Civil Rights Law banning race-based gerrymandering. (Case No. 99-1864).The Supreme Court held in the case that as Southern blacks tend to vote for the Democratic Party, North Carolina's 12th congressional district was drawn based upon voting behavior, instead of upon racial characteristics. The allegedly odd-shaped district was allowed to stand. Critics of this ruling found this to be a case of judicial nitpicking and that the Court had in essence allowed the previously-banned practice of concentrating a racial group into a single district.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageID "182958".
- Easley_v._Cromartie wikiPageRevisionID "528319176".
- Easley_v._Cromartie arguedate "--11-27".
- Easley_v._Cromartie argueyear "2000".
- Easley_v._Cromartie decidedate "--04-18".
- Easley_v._Cromartie decideyear "2001".
- Easley_v._Cromartie dissent "Thomas".
- Easley_v._Cromartie fullname "Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie hasPhotoCollection Easley_v._Cromartie.
- Easley_v._Cromartie holding "The District Court's conclusion that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries is based on clearly erroneous findings.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie joindissent "Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy".
- Easley_v._Cromartie joinmajority "Stevens, O'Connor, Souter, Ginsburg".
- Easley_v._Cromartie litigants "Easley v. Cromartie".
- Easley_v._Cromartie majority "Breyer".
- Easley_v._Cromartie scotus "1994".
- Easley_v._Cromartie uspage "234".
- Easley_v._Cromartie usvol "532".
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:2001_in_United_States_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:Congressional_districts_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:Legal_history_of_North_Carolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Easley_v._Cromartie subject Category:United_States_electoral_redistricting_case_law.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type CongressionalDistrict108542884.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type CongressionalDistrictsOfNorthCarolina.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type District108552138.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Location100027167.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Object100002684.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Region108630985.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type YagoGeoEntity.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Case.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type LegalCase.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type UnitOfWork.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Event.
- Easley_v._Cromartie type Situation.
- Easley_v._Cromartie comment "Easley v. Cromartie, 532 US 234 (2001), also known as Hunt v. Cromartie, was a U.S. Supreme Court case. The court's ruling on April 18, 2001 stated that redistricting for political reasons did not violate Federal Civil Rights Law banning race-based gerrymandering. (Case No.".
- Easley_v._Cromartie label "Easley v. Cromartie".
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs m.018_f5.
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs Q5327543.
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs Q5327543.
- Easley_v._Cromartie sameAs Easley_v._Cromartie.
- Easley_v._Cromartie wasDerivedFrom Easley_v._Cromartie?oldid=528319176.
- Easley_v._Cromartie isPrimaryTopicOf Easley_v._Cromartie.
- Easley_v._Cromartie name "Michael F. Easley, Governor of North Carolina v. Martin Cromartie, et al.".