Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 46 of
46
with 100 items per page.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel abstract "Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act (Coal Act) constituted an unconstitutional regulatory taking of property which required the Act to be invalidated. The import of this decision is that it was made in the context of a purely economic regulation. The plurality examines the statute and its resultant harm as an ad hoc factual inquiry based on factors delineated in Penn Central such as the economic impact of the regulation, its interference with reasonable investment backed expectations, and the character of the governmental action.(Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City), The decision thereby moved beyond the traditional notions of equal protection which had been applied to economic regulation since the time of (Lochner v. New York), requiring extreme deference to Congress, and applied a regulatory takings analysis to the problem resulting in a much less deferential result. While the plurality recognizes that this is not a traditional takings case where the government appropriates private property for public use, they also state this is the type of case where the "Armstrong Principle" of preventing the government from forcing some people alone to bear public burdens which, in all fairness and justice, should be borne by the public as a whole. (Armstrong v. United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960)) However, while the plurality seems to invalidate this particular law on takings grounds, the concurrences and the dissents warn of such an analysis as this should actually be examined under substantive due process or ex post facto theories.".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel wikiPageID "22444211".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel wikiPageRevisionID "596825607".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel arguedate "--03-04".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel argueyear "1998".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel citation "172800.0".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel concurrence "Thomas".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel dissent "Kennedy".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel decidedate "--06-25".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel decideyear "1998".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel dissent "Breyer".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel dissent "Stevens".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel fullname "Eastern Enterprises, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, et al.".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel hasPhotoCollection Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel holding "Whether a regulatory act constitutes a taking requiring compensation depends on the extent of diminution in the value of the property.".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel joindissent "Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel joindissent "Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel joinplurality "Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel lawsapplied Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel lawsapplied Coal_Industry_Retiree_Health_Benefit_Act_of_1992.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel litigants "Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel plurality "O'Connor".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel prior "25920.0".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel scotus "1994".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel uspage "498".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel usvol "524".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel subject Category:1998_in_United_States_case_law.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel subject Category:Coal_mining_in_the_United_States.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel subject Category:Takings_Clause_case_law.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_First_Circuit_cases.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type Case.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type LegalCase.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type UnitOfWork.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type Event.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel type Situation.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel comment "Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act (Coal Act) constituted an unconstitutional regulatory taking of property which required the Act to be invalidated. The import of this decision is that it was made in the context of a purely economic regulation.".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel label "Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel".
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel sameAs m.05zzkz8.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel sameAs Q5330128.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel sameAs Q5330128.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel wasDerivedFrom Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel?oldid=596825607.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel isPrimaryTopicOf Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel.
- Eastern_Enterprises_v._Apfel name "Eastern Enterprises, Petitioner v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, et al.".