Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Engblom_v._Carey> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 31 of
31
with 100 items per page.
- Engblom_v._Carey abstract "Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), on rem. 572 F. Supp. 44 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), aff'd. per curiam 724 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1983), was a court case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is the only significant court decision based on a direct challenge under the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution.[citation needed]".
- Engblom_v._Carey thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-2ndCircuit-Seal.png?width=300.
- Engblom_v._Carey wikiPageExternalLink 677.F2d.957.81-7769.732.html.
- Engblom_v._Carey wikiPageID "523100".
- Engblom_v._Carey wikiPageRevisionID "602733310".
- Engblom_v._Carey arguedate "1998-09-01".
- Engblom_v._Carey citations "17280.0".
- Engblom_v._Carey concurrence "Keinferd".
- Engblom_v._Carey court "United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit".
- Engblom_v._Carey courtseal File:US-CourtOfAppeals-2ndCircuit-Seal.png.
- Engblom_v._Carey decidedate "--05-03".
- Engblom_v._Carey decideyear "1982".
- Engblom_v._Carey dissent "Kaufman".
- Engblom_v._Carey fullname "MARIANNE E. ENGBLOM and CHARLES E. PALMER, Plaintiff-Appellants, against HUGH L. CAREY, Governor of the State of New York, RICHARD D. HONGISTO, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, JOSEPH C. SNOW, Superintendent of the Mid-Orange Correctional Facility, MAJOR-GENERAL VITO J. CASTELLANO, Chief of Staff to the Governor of New York, New York National Guard, LIEUTENANT-COLONEL JUSTIN M. QUEALLY, an Officer of the 106th Maintenance Battalion of the New York National Guard, Captain "JOHN" DREW, an Officer of the 101st Signal Battalion of the New York National Guard, and VARIOUS OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MEN, Members of the New York National Guard, Defendants-Appellees".
- Engblom_v._Carey hasPhotoCollection Engblom_v._Carey.
- Engblom_v._Carey holding "A state National Guardsman is a "soldier" by definition of the Third Amendment, and due to this, the defendants' Third Amendment rights were violated by housing them in the defendants' residence without their expressed consent. Even though they did not own the property they dwelled in, they were still entitled to the Amendment, because they lived in the building as an "Owner" would. By virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Third is incorporated onto the states. District court affirmed.".
- Engblom_v._Carey judges "Keinferd , Mansfield, Kaufman".
- Engblom_v._Carey lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Engblom_v._Carey lawsapplied Third_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Engblom_v._Carey litigants "Engblom v. Carey".
- Engblom_v._Carey majority "Mansfield".
- Engblom_v._Carey subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Second_Circuit_cases.
- Engblom_v._Carey subject Category:United_States_Third_Amendment_case_law.
- Engblom_v._Carey comment "Engblom v. Carey, 677 F.2d 957 (2d Cir. 1982), on rem. 572 F. Supp. 44 (S.D.N.Y. 1982), aff'd. per curiam 724 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1983), was a court case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is the only significant court decision based on a direct challenge under the Third Amendment to the United States Constitution.[citation needed]".
- Engblom_v._Carey label "Engblom v. Carey".
- Engblom_v._Carey sameAs m.02l891.
- Engblom_v._Carey sameAs Q5377456.
- Engblom_v._Carey sameAs Q5377456.
- Engblom_v._Carey wasDerivedFrom Engblom_v._Carey?oldid=602733310.
- Engblom_v._Carey depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-2ndCircuit-Seal.png.
- Engblom_v._Carey isPrimaryTopicOf Engblom_v._Carey.