Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Estelle_v._Smith> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 56 of
56
with 100 items per page.
- Estelle_v._Smith abstract "Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, per Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the state may not force a defendant to submit to a psychiatric examination solely for the purposes of sentencing. Any such examination violates the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination as well as the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and is therefore inadmissible at sentencing.".
- Estelle_v._Smith wikiPageExternalLink icb.do?keyword=k9840&pageid=icb.page36965&pageContentId=icb.pagecontent90797&view=view.do&viewParam_name=BarefootvEstelle.html.
- Estelle_v._Smith wikiPageID "15398600".
- Estelle_v._Smith wikiPageRevisionID "527553496".
- Estelle_v._Smith arguedate "--10-08".
- Estelle_v._Smith argueyear "1980".
- Estelle_v._Smith citation "172800.0".
- Estelle_v._Smith concurrence "Brennan".
- Estelle_v._Smith concurrence "Marshall".
- Estelle_v._Smith concurrence "Rehnquist".
- Estelle_v._Smith concurrence "Stewart".
- Estelle_v._Smith decidedate "--05-18".
- Estelle_v._Smith decideyear "1981".
- Estelle_v._Smith fullname "Estelle, Corrections Director v. Ernest Benjamin Smith".
- Estelle_v._Smith hasPhotoCollection Estelle_v._Smith.
- Estelle_v._Smith holding ""An accused who neither initiates a psychiatric evaluation nor attempts to introduce any psychiatric evidence may not be compelled to respond to a psychiatrist if his statements can be used against him at a capital sentencing proceeding."".
- Estelle_v._Smith joinconcurrence "Powell".
- Estelle_v._Smith joinmajority "Brennan, White, Blackmun, Stevens; Marshall".
- Estelle_v._Smith lawsapplied Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Estelle_v._Smith lawsapplied Sixth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Estelle_v._Smith litigants "Estelle v. Smith".
- Estelle_v._Smith majority "Burger".
- Estelle_v._Smith prior "Certiorari to the Federal District Court of Appeals".
- Estelle_v._Smith scotus "1975".
- Estelle_v._Smith uspage "454".
- Estelle_v._Smith usvol "451".
- Estelle_v._Smith subject Category:1981_in_United_States_case_law.
- Estelle_v._Smith subject Category:Psychiatry_controversies.
- Estelle_v._Smith subject Category:United_States_Fifth_Amendment_case_law.
- Estelle_v._Smith subject Category:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_assistance_of_counsel_case_law.
- Estelle_v._Smith subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Abstraction100002137.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Act100030358.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Controversy107183151.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Disagreement107180787.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Dispute107181935.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Event100029378.
- Estelle_v._Smith type PsychiatryControversies.
- Estelle_v._Smith type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Estelle_v._Smith type SpeechAct107160883.
- Estelle_v._Smith type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Case.
- Estelle_v._Smith type LegalCase.
- Estelle_v._Smith type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Estelle_v._Smith type UnitOfWork.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Event.
- Estelle_v._Smith type Situation.
- Estelle_v._Smith comment "Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, per Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the state may not force a defendant to submit to a psychiatric examination solely for the purposes of sentencing. Any such examination violates the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination as well as the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, and is therefore inadmissible at sentencing.".
- Estelle_v._Smith label "Estelle v. Smith".
- Estelle_v._Smith sameAs m.03m725g.
- Estelle_v._Smith sameAs Q5400950.
- Estelle_v._Smith sameAs Q5400950.
- Estelle_v._Smith sameAs Estelle_v._Smith.
- Estelle_v._Smith wasDerivedFrom Estelle_v._Smith?oldid=527553496.
- Estelle_v._Smith isPrimaryTopicOf Estelle_v._Smith.
- Estelle_v._Smith name "Estelle, Corrections Director v. Ernest Benjamin Smith".