Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ewing_v._California> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 53 of
53
with 100 items per page.
- Ewing_v._California abstract "Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), is one of two cases upholding a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law against a challenge that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. As in its prior decision in Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), the United States Supreme Court could not agree on the precise reasoning for upholding the sentence. Nevertheless, with the decision in Ewing and the companion case Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 U.S. 63 (2003), the Court effectively foreclosed criminal defendants from arguing that their noncapital sentences were disproportional to the crime they had committed.Ewing was represented in the Court by Quin Denvir. The Attorney General of California argued for the State of California. Michael Chertoff argued on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae.".
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink 01-6978.html.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink sentencing0203.html.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink 10196prs20030305.html.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink EwingS.htm.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink 01-6978.ZS.html.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink resources.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink 01-6978.pdf.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink 01-6978.pdf.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageExternalLink constitution_law_ewing.htm.
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageID "7449380".
- Ewing_v._California wikiPageRevisionID "489316987".
- Ewing_v._California arguedate "--11-05".
- Ewing_v._California argueyear "2002".
- Ewing_v._California concurrence "Scalia".
- Ewing_v._California concurrence "Thomas".
- Ewing_v._California decidedate "--03-05".
- Ewing_v._California decideyear "2003".
- Ewing_v._California dissent "Breyer".
- Ewing_v._California dissent "Stevens".
- Ewing_v._California fullname "Gary Ewing v. State of California".
- Ewing_v._California hasPhotoCollection Ewing_v._California.
- Ewing_v._California holding "California's three strikes law does not violate the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.".
- Ewing_v._California joindissent "Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Ewing_v._California joindissent "Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg".
- Ewing_v._California joinmajority "Rehnquist, Kennedy".
- Ewing_v._California lawsapplied "U.S. Const. amend. VIII; Cal. Penal Code § 667".
- Ewing_v._California litigants "Ewing v. California".
- Ewing_v._California majority "O'Connor".
- Ewing_v._California prior "Defendant convicted in Los Angeles County Superior Court; conviction affirmed by California Court of Appeal; California Supreme Court declined review, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.".
- Ewing_v._California scotus "1994".
- Ewing_v._California uspage "11".
- Ewing_v._California usvol "538".
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:2003_in_California.
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:2003_in_United_States_case_law.
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:Cruel_and_Unusual_Punishment_Clause_case_law.
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:Legal_history_of_California.
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Ewing_v._California subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court.
- Ewing_v._California type Case.
- Ewing_v._California type LegalCase.
- Ewing_v._California type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Ewing_v._California type UnitOfWork.
- Ewing_v._California type Event.
- Ewing_v._California type Situation.
- Ewing_v._California comment "Ewing v. California, 538 U.S. 11 (2003), is one of two cases upholding a sentence imposed under California's three strikes law against a challenge that it constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment. As in its prior decision in Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991), the United States Supreme Court could not agree on the precise reasoning for upholding the sentence. Nevertheless, with the decision in Ewing and the companion case Lockyer v.".
- Ewing_v._California label "Ewing v. California".
- Ewing_v._California sameAs m.02621v3.
- Ewing_v._California sameAs Q5419061.
- Ewing_v._California sameAs Q5419061.
- Ewing_v._California wasDerivedFrom Ewing_v._California?oldid=489316987.
- Ewing_v._California isPrimaryTopicOf Ewing_v._California.
- Ewing_v._California name "Gary Ewing v. State of California".