Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 59 of
59
with 100 items per page.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC abstract "Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008), is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) did not apply to an interactive online operator whose questionnaire violated the Fair Housing Act. However, the court found that Roommates.com was immune under Section 230 of the CDA for the “additional comments” portion of the website. This case is notable because it placed a limit on the broad immunity that Section 230(c) gives to service providers.".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC thumbnail US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg?width=300.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink ninth_circuit_s.htm.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink roommatescom_de_1.htm.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink roommatescom_is.htm.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink how-the-roommatescom-decision-is-good-for-section-230.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink ninth-circuit-rules-roommatescom-may-be-unlawful-host.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink 12955-12956.2.html.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink the-ninth-circu.html.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink 24-563-592.pdf.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink roommatescom-just-how-big-hole-did-ninth-circuit-poke-cda-230?.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink 1579.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink www.roommates.com.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink roommatescom-no.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageExternalLink 230.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageID "31061154".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wikiPageRevisionID "599237108".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC arguedate "--12-12".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC argueyear "2007".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC chiefjudge Alex_Kozinski.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC citation "25920.0".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC court "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC courtseal "100".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC decidedate "--04-03".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC decideyear "2008".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC dissent M._Margaret_McKeown.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC fullname "Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC hasPhotoCollection Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC holding "The Ninth Circuit, en banc, upheld the three judge panel’s holding. It found that the portion of the Roommates.com website that presented a questionnaire to users was not immune under Section 230 of the CDA because Roommates.com was considered an information content provider, and the questions violated the FHA. However, the portion of the website labeled “Additional Comments” qualified for immunity because Roommates.com was not considered an information content provider for this information.".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC italicTitle "force".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Alex_Kozinski.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Barry_G._Silverman.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Carlos_Bea.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges M._Margaret_McKeown.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Milan_Smith.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges N._Randy_Smith.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Pamela_Ann_Rymer.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Raymond_C._Fisher.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Richard_Paez.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges Stephen_Reinhardt.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC judges William_A._Fletcher.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC lawsapplied Civil_Rights_Act_of_1968.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC lawsapplied Communications_Decency_Act.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC lawsapplied Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC litigants "Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC majority Alex_Kozinski.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC prior "25920.0".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC subject Category:2008_in_United_States_case_law.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC subject Category:Section_230_of_the_Communications_Decency_Act.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC subject Category:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit_cases.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC subject Category:United_States_Internet_case_law.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC comment "Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC, 521 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 2008), is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA) did not apply to an interactive online operator whose questionnaire violated the Fair Housing Act.".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC label "Fair Housing Council of San Fernando Valley v. Roommates.com, LLC".
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC sameAs m.0gg8csv.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC sameAs Q5429835.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC sameAs Q5429835.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC wasDerivedFrom Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC?oldid=599237108.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC depiction US-CourtOfAppeals-9thCircuit-Seal.svg.
- Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC isPrimaryTopicOf Fair_Housing_Council_of_San_Fernando_Valley_v._Roommates.com,_LLC.
