Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Feist_v._Rural> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Feist_v._Rural abstract "Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that information alone without a minimum of original creativity cannot be protected by copyright. In the case appealed, Feist had copied information from Rural's telephone listings to include in its own, after Rural had refused to license the information. Rural sued for copyright infringement. The Court ruled that information contained in Rural's phone directory was not copyrightable and that therefore no infringement existed.".
- Feist_v._Rural wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?court=US&vol=499&invol=340.
- Feist_v._Rural wikiPageExternalLink vol1_art5.pdf.
- Feist_v._Rural wikiPageID "18932399".
- Feist_v._Rural wikiPageRevisionID "598942063".
- Feist_v._Rural arguedate "--01-09".
- Feist_v._Rural argueyear "1991".
- Feist_v._Rural citation "172800.0".
- Feist_v._Rural concurrence "Blackmun".
- Feist_v._Rural decidedate "--03-27".
- Feist_v._Rural decideyear "1991".
- Feist_v._Rural fullname "Feist Publications, Incorporated v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Incorporated".
- Feist_v._Rural hasPhotoCollection Feist_v._Rural.
- Feist_v._Rural holding "The white pages of a telephone book did not satisfy the minimum originality required by the Constitution to be eligible for copyright protection, and effort and expenditure of resources are not protected by copyright. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed.".
- Feist_v._Rural joinmajority "Rehnquist, White, Marshall, Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter".
- Feist_v._Rural lawsapplied Article_One_of_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Feist_v._Rural litigants "Feist v. Rural".
- Feist_v._Rural majority "O'Connor".
- Feist_v._Rural prior "17280.0".
- Feist_v._Rural scotus "1990".
- Feist_v._Rural uspage "340".
- Feist_v._Rural usvol "499".
- Feist_v._Rural subject Category:1991_in_United_States_case_law.
- Feist_v._Rural subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Feist_v._Rural subject Category:United_States_copyright_case_law.
- Feist_v._Rural subject Category:Yellow_pages.
- Feist_v._Rural type Case.
- Feist_v._Rural type LegalCase.
- Feist_v._Rural type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Feist_v._Rural type UnitOfWork.
- Feist_v._Rural type Situation.
- Feist_v._Rural comment "Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States establishing that information alone without a minimum of original creativity cannot be protected by copyright. In the case appealed, Feist had copied information from Rural's telephone listings to include in its own, after Rural had refused to license the information. Rural sued for copyright infringement.".
- Feist_v._Rural label "Caso Feist contra Rural".
- Feist_v._Rural label "Feist v. Rural".
- Feist_v._Rural label "費斯特出版公司訴鄉村電話公司案".
- Feist_v._Rural sameAs Caso_Feist_contra_Rural.
- Feist_v._Rural sameAs m.02x5_.
- Feist_v._Rural sameAs Q5441583.
- Feist_v._Rural sameAs Q5441583.
- Feist_v._Rural wasDerivedFrom Feist_v._Rural?oldid=598942063.
- Feist_v._Rural isPrimaryTopicOf Feist_v._Rural.
- Feist_v._Rural name "Feist Publications, Incorporated v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Incorporated".