Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Flast_v._Cohen> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- Flast_v._Cohen abstract "Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that a taxpayer has standing to sue the government to prevent an unconstitutional use of taxpayer funds.In 1923 the Supreme Court decided in Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), that a taxpayer did not have standing to sue the federal government to prevent expenditures if her only injury is an anticipated increase in taxes. In 1968 Florance Flast joined several others in filing suit against Wilbur Cohen, the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, contending that spending funds on religious schools violated the First Amendment's ban on the establishment of religion. The district court denied standing, and the Supreme Court heard the appeal.".
- Flast_v._Cohen wikiPageExternalLink case29.htm.
- Flast_v._Cohen wikiPageID "490060".
- Flast_v._Cohen wikiPageRevisionID "589833863".
- Flast_v._Cohen arguedate "--03-12".
- Flast_v._Cohen argueyear "1968".
- Flast_v._Cohen citation "172800.0".
- Flast_v._Cohen concurrence "Douglas".
- Flast_v._Cohen concurrence "Fortas".
- Flast_v._Cohen concurrence "Stewart".
- Flast_v._Cohen decidedate "--06-10".
- Flast_v._Cohen decideyear "1968".
- Flast_v._Cohen dissent "Harlan".
- Flast_v._Cohen fullname "Flast et al. v. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare et al.".
- Flast_v._Cohen hasPhotoCollection Flast_v._Cohen.
- Flast_v._Cohen holding "Taxpayers have standing to sue to prevent the disbursement of federal funds in contravention of the specific constitutional prohibition against government support of religion.".
- Flast_v._Cohen joinmajority "Black, Douglas, Stewart, Brennan, White, Marshall".
- Flast_v._Cohen lawsapplied "U.S. Constitution, Art. I, Sec. 8, Art. III".
- Flast_v._Cohen litigants "Flast v. Cohen".
- Flast_v._Cohen majority "Warren".
- Flast_v._Cohen prior "Dismissed for lack of standing, 267 F. Supp. 351 ; probable jurisdiction noted, 389 U.S. 895".
- Flast_v._Cohen scotus "1967".
- Flast_v._Cohen uspage "83".
- Flast_v._Cohen usvol "392".
- Flast_v._Cohen subject Category:1968_in_United_States_case_law.
- Flast_v._Cohen subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Flast_v._Cohen subject Category:United_States_standing_case_law.
- Flast_v._Cohen type AdministrativeDistrict108491826.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Country108544813.
- Flast_v._Cohen type District108552138.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Location100027167.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Object100002684.
- Flast_v._Cohen type PhysicalEntity100001930.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Region108630985.
- Flast_v._Cohen type UnitedStatesStandingCaseLaw.
- Flast_v._Cohen type YagoGeoEntity.
- Flast_v._Cohen type YagoLegalActorGeo.
- Flast_v._Cohen type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Case.
- Flast_v._Cohen type LegalCase.
- Flast_v._Cohen type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Flast_v._Cohen type UnitOfWork.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Event.
- Flast_v._Cohen type Situation.
- Flast_v._Cohen comment "Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that a taxpayer has standing to sue the government to prevent an unconstitutional use of taxpayer funds.In 1923 the Supreme Court decided in Frothingham v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 (1923), that a taxpayer did not have standing to sue the federal government to prevent expenditures if her only injury is an anticipated increase in taxes.".
- Flast_v._Cohen label "Flast v. Cohen".
- Flast_v._Cohen label "弗拉斯特诉科恩案".
- Flast_v._Cohen sameAs m.02gqdj.
- Flast_v._Cohen sameAs Q5457681.
- Flast_v._Cohen sameAs Q5457681.
- Flast_v._Cohen sameAs Flast_v._Cohen.
- Flast_v._Cohen wasDerivedFrom Flast_v._Cohen?oldid=589833863.
- Flast_v._Cohen isPrimaryTopicOf Flast_v._Cohen.
- Flast_v._Cohen name "Flast et al. v. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare et al.".