Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Fuentes_v._Shevin> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 39 of
39
with 100 items per page.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin abstract "Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States wherein petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the Uniform Commercial Code provisions of two states, Florida and Pennsylvania, which allowed for the summary seizure of a person's goods or chattels under a writ of replevin. The statutes were challenged under the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court held that the statutes acted as deprivations of plaintiff's property without due process.The Court noted that seizure without notice and the opportunity for a hearing is acceptable only under limited circumstances:The seizure is necessary for an important public or government interest,There is a need for prompt action, andThe seizure is initiated by an agent of the government.These exceptions would apply (for example) when property is tainted food, misbranded drugs or unpaid taxes needed to fund a war.".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin wikiPageID "10781813".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin wikiPageRevisionID "495016202".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin arguedate "--11-09".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin argueyear "1971".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin citation "172800.0".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin decidedate "--06-12".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin decideyear "1972".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin dissent "White".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin fullname "Fuentes v. Shevin, Attorney General of Florida, et al.".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin hasPhotoCollection Fuentes_v._Shevin.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin holding "Statutes in Florida and Pennsylvania that allowed for the repossession of petitioners' property without prior notice or hearing violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of procedural due process.".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin joindissent "Burger, Blackmun".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin joinmajority "Douglas, Brennan, Marshall".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin litigants "Fuentes v. Shevin".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin majority "Stewart".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin notparticipating "Powell and Rehnquist".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin scotus "1972".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin uspage "67".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin usvol "407".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin subject Category:1972_in_United_States_case_law.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin subject Category:United_States_civil_due_process_case_law.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type Case.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type LegalCase.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type UnitOfWork.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type Event.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin type Situation.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin comment "Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States wherein petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the Uniform Commercial Code provisions of two states, Florida and Pennsylvania, which allowed for the summary seizure of a person's goods or chattels under a writ of replevin. The statutes were challenged under the Fourteenth Amendment.".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin label "Fuentes v. Shevin".
- Fuentes_v._Shevin sameAs m.02qptq4.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin sameAs Q5507203.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin sameAs Q5507203.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin wasDerivedFrom Fuentes_v._Shevin?oldid=495016202.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin isPrimaryTopicOf Fuentes_v._Shevin.
- Fuentes_v._Shevin name "Fuentes v. Shevin, Attorney General of Florida, et al.".