Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hamilton_v._Regents> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 41 of
41
with 100 items per page.
- Hamilton_v._Regents abstract "Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California, 293 U.S. 245 (1934), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the "right of California to force its university students to take classes in military training" and reiterated that "[i]nstruction in military science is not instruction in the practice or tenets of a religion." It was also held that the University of California constituted a corporation created by the state to administer the University, its president, and its provost, and as held is a constitutional department or function of the state government and as such an order by the regents is in effect a statute or law of the state.".
- Hamilton_v._Regents wikiPageExternalLink 1867_68.pdf.
- Hamilton_v._Regents wikiPageID "20404444".
- Hamilton_v._Regents wikiPageRevisionID "590590698".
- Hamilton_v._Regents arguedatea "--10-17".
- Hamilton_v._Regents arguedateb "18".
- Hamilton_v._Regents argueyear "1934".
- Hamilton_v._Regents citation "55".
- Hamilton_v._Regents decidedate "--12-03".
- Hamilton_v._Regents decideyear "1934".
- Hamilton_v._Regents fullname "Hamilton, et al. v. Regents of the University of California, et al.".
- Hamilton_v._Regents hasPhotoCollection Hamilton_v._Regents.
- Hamilton_v._Regents holding "That an order of the regents requiring students at its University to take a course in military science and tactics is a statute of the State of California;".
- Hamilton_v._Regents holding "that each state has authority to train its able-bodied male citizens of suitable age to fit them, if called upon, for service in the United states Army, the state militia, or the local constabulary or police;".
- Hamilton_v._Regents holding "that such an order does not violate the privilege and immunities clause.".
- Hamilton_v._Regents holding "that such an order is not repugnant to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as an undue deprivation of liberty; and".
- Hamilton_v._Regents joinmajority "unanimous".
- Hamilton_v._Regents litigants "Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California".
- Hamilton_v._Regents majority "Butler".
- Hamilton_v._Regents scotus "1932".
- Hamilton_v._Regents subsequent "rehearing denied 293 U.S. 633, 55 S.Ct. 345, 79 L.Ed. —".
- Hamilton_v._Regents uspage "245".
- Hamilton_v._Regents usvol "293".
- Hamilton_v._Regents subject Category:1934_in_United_States_case_law.
- Hamilton_v._Regents subject Category:1934_in_religion.
- Hamilton_v._Regents subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Hamilton_v._Regents subject Category:United_States_free_exercise_of_religion_case_law.
- Hamilton_v._Regents subject Category:University_of_California_litigation.
- Hamilton_v._Regents type Case.
- Hamilton_v._Regents type LegalCase.
- Hamilton_v._Regents type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Hamilton_v._Regents type UnitOfWork.
- Hamilton_v._Regents type Situation.
- Hamilton_v._Regents comment "Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California, 293 U.S.".
- Hamilton_v._Regents label "Hamilton v. Regents".
- Hamilton_v._Regents sameAs m.04zvfcs.
- Hamilton_v._Regents sameAs Q5645286.
- Hamilton_v._Regents sameAs Q5645286.
- Hamilton_v._Regents wasDerivedFrom Hamilton_v._Regents?oldid=590590698.
- Hamilton_v._Regents isPrimaryTopicOf Hamilton_v._Regents.
- Hamilton_v._Regents name "Hamilton, et al. v. Regents of the University of California, et al.".