Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Hartman_v._Moore> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Hartman_v._Moore abstract "Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the pleading standard for retaliatory prosecution claims against government officials. Following a successful lobbying attempt by the CEO of a manufacturing company against competing devices that the United States Postal Service supported, the CEO found himself the target of an investigation by U.S. postal inspectors and a criminal prosecution, which was dismissed for lack of evidence. The CEO then filed suit against the inspectors and other government officials for seeking to prosecute him in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment rights to criticize postal policy. The Court ruled, 5-2, that in order to prove that the prosecution was caused by a retaliatory motive, the plaintiff bringing such a claim must allege and prove that the criminal charges were brought without probable cause.".
- Hartman_v._Moore wikiPageExternalLink 04-1495.pdf.
- Hartman_v._Moore wikiPageID "5170656".
- Hartman_v._Moore wikiPageRevisionID "534685857".
- Hartman_v._Moore arguedate "--01-10".
- Hartman_v._Moore argueyear "2006".
- Hartman_v._Moore decidedate "--04-26".
- Hartman_v._Moore decideyear "2006".
- Hartman_v._Moore dissent "Ginsburg".
- Hartman_v._Moore docket "4".
- Hartman_v._Moore fullname "Michael Hartman, Frank Kormann, Pierce McIntosh, Norman Robbins, and Robert Edwards v. William G. Moore, Jr.".
- Hartman_v._Moore hasPhotoCollection Hartman_v._Moore.
- Hartman_v._Moore holding "A plaintiff in a retaliatory-prosecution action against federal officials must plead and show the absence of probable cause for pressing the underlying criminal charges. DC Circuit Court of Appeals reversed and remanded.".
- Hartman_v._Moore joindissent "Breyer".
- Hartman_v._Moore joinmajority "Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas".
- Hartman_v._Moore litigants "Hartman v. Moore".
- Hartman_v._Moore majority "Souter".
- Hartman_v._Moore notparticipating "Roberts and Alito".
- Hartman_v._Moore parallelcitations "172800.0".
- Hartman_v._Moore prior "25920.0".
- Hartman_v._Moore scotus "2006".
- Hartman_v._Moore subsequent "Moore's motion to compel testimony granted, 241 F.R.D. 59".
- Hartman_v._Moore uspage "250".
- Hartman_v._Moore usvol "547".
- Hartman_v._Moore subject Category:2006_in_United_States_case_law.
- Hartman_v._Moore subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Hartman_v._Moore subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Hartman_v._Moore subject Category:United_States_constitutional_torts_case_law.
- Hartman_v._Moore type Case.
- Hartman_v._Moore type LegalCase.
- Hartman_v._Moore type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Hartman_v._Moore type UnitOfWork.
- Hartman_v._Moore type Event.
- Hartman_v._Moore type Situation.
- Hartman_v._Moore comment "Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the pleading standard for retaliatory prosecution claims against government officials. Following a successful lobbying attempt by the CEO of a manufacturing company against competing devices that the United States Postal Service supported, the CEO found himself the target of an investigation by U.S. postal inspectors and a criminal prosecution, which was dismissed for lack of evidence.".
- Hartman_v._Moore label "Hartman v. Moore".
- Hartman_v._Moore sameAs m.0d62t6.
- Hartman_v._Moore sameAs Q5675013.
- Hartman_v._Moore sameAs Q5675013.
- Hartman_v._Moore wasDerivedFrom Hartman_v._Moore?oldid=534685857.
- Hartman_v._Moore isPrimaryTopicOf Hartman_v._Moore.
- Hartman_v._Moore name "Michael Hartman, Frank Kormann, Pierce McIntosh, Norman Robbins, and Robert Edwards v. William G. Moore, Jr.".