Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 42 of
42
with 100 items per page.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States abstract "Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 342 (1914), also known as Shreveport Rate Case, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court expanding the power of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Justice Hughes's majority opinion stated that the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce also allowed it to regulate purely intrastate commerce in cases where control of the former was not possible without control of the latter. Because the Supreme Court consolidated several related appeals, they are sometimes collectively known as the "Shreveport Rate Cases" although the Supreme Court issued only one ruling.".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink ?id=zegeQtMn9JsC&pg=PA377.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=234&page=342.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wikiPageExternalLink abstract.html?res=9D01E7DD143FE633A25750C2A9639C946296D6CF.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wikiPageID "7082491".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wikiPageRevisionID "591717373".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States arguedatea "--10-28".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States arguedateb "29".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States argueyear "1913".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States decidedate "--06-08".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States decideyear "1914".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States dissent "Lurton".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States dissent "Pitney".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States fullname "Houston, East & West Texas Railway Company and Houston & Shreveport Railroad Company et al., Appellants, v. United States, the Interstate Commerce Commission et al., No. 567, and Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. United States, the Interstate Commerce Commission et al., No. 568.".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States hasPhotoCollection Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States holding "Congressional authority necessarily embraces the right to control operations in all matters having a close and substantial relation to interstate traffic, to the efficiency of interstate service, and to the maintenance of conditions under which interstate commerce may be conducted upon fair terms.".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States litigants "Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. United States".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States majority "Hughes".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States scotus "1912".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States uspage "342".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States usvol "234".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:1914_in_United_States_case_law.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:1914_in_rail_transport.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:History_of_Shreveport,_Louisiana.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:Interstate_Commerce_Commission_litigation.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:Southern_Pacific_Railroad.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Commerce_Clause_case_law.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type Case.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type LegalCase.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type UnitOfWork.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type Event.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States type Situation.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States comment "Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. United States, 234 U.S. 342 (1914), also known as Shreveport Rate Case, was a decision of the United States Supreme Court expanding the power of the Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States. Justice Hughes's majority opinion stated that the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce also allowed it to regulate purely intrastate commerce in cases where control of the former was not possible without control of the latter.".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States label "Houston E. & W. T. Ry. Co. v. United States".
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States sameAs m.0h39z8.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States sameAs Q16980411.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States sameAs Q16980411.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States wasDerivedFrom Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States?oldid=591717373.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States isPrimaryTopicOf Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States.
- Houston_E._&_W._T._Ry._Co._v._United_States name "Houston, East & West Texas Railway Company and Houston & Shreveport Railroad Company et al., Appellants, v. United States, the Interstate Commerce Commission et al., No. 567, and Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. United States, the Interstate Commerce Commission et al., No. 568.".