Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Gault> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- In_re_Gault abstract "In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights.".
- In_re_Gault wikiPageExternalLink in_re_gault64.mp3.
- In_re_Gault wikiPageExternalLink 116_19661216-argument.mp3.
- In_re_Gault wikiPageID "7087464".
- In_re_Gault wikiPageRevisionID "604382372".
- In_re_Gault arguedate "--12-16".
- In_re_Gault argueyear "1966".
- In_re_Gault citation "172800.0".
- In_re_Gault concurrence "Black".
- In_re_Gault concurrence "White".
- In_re_Gault dissent "Harlan".
- In_re_Gault decidedate "--05-15".
- In_re_Gault decideyear "1967".
- In_re_Gault dissent "Stewart".
- In_re_Gault fullname "In re Gault et al.".
- In_re_Gault hasPhotoCollection In_re_Gault.
- In_re_Gault holding "Juveniles tried for crimes in delinquency proceedings should have the right of due process protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, including the right to confront witnesses and the right to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment.".
- In_re_Gault joinmajority "Warren, Douglas, Clark, Brennan".
- In_re_Gault lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- In_re_Gault litigants "In re Gault".
- In_re_Gault majority "Fortas".
- In_re_Gault prior "Appeal from the Supreme Court of Arizona".
- In_re_Gault scotus "1965".
- In_re_Gault uspage "1".
- In_re_Gault usvol "387".
- In_re_Gault subject Category:1967_in_United_States_case_law.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:Confrontation_Clause_case_law.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:Laws_affecting_youth_rights.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:United_States_Sixth_Amendment_assistance_of_counsel_case_law.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:United_States_children's_rights_case_law.
- In_re_Gault subject Category:United_States_criminal_due_process_case_law.
- In_re_Gault type Abstraction100002137.
- In_re_Gault type Collection107951464.
- In_re_Gault type Group100031264.
- In_re_Gault type Law108441203.
- In_re_Gault type LawsAffectingYouthRights.
- In_re_Gault type Case.
- In_re_Gault type LegalCase.
- In_re_Gault type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- In_re_Gault type UnitOfWork.
- In_re_Gault type Event.
- In_re_Gault type Situation.
- In_re_Gault comment "In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that juveniles accused of crimes in a delinquency proceeding must be afforded many of the same due process rights as adults, such as the right to timely notification of the charges, the right to confront witnesses, the right against self-incrimination, and the right to counsel. The court's opinion was written by Justice Abe Fortas, a noted proponent of children's rights.".
- In_re_Gault label "In re Gault".
- In_re_Gault sameAs m.0h3kgj.
- In_re_Gault sameAs Q6011680.
- In_re_Gault sameAs Q6011680.
- In_re_Gault sameAs In_re_Gault.
- In_re_Gault wasDerivedFrom In_re_Gault?oldid=604382372.
- In_re_Gault isPrimaryTopicOf In_re_Gault.
- In_re_Gault name "In re Gault et al.".