Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Neagle> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 40 of
40
with 100 items per page.
- In_re_Neagle abstract "In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined the question of whether the Attorney General of the United States had authority to appoint U.S. Marshals as bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices.".
- In_re_Neagle wikiPageExternalLink 182.
- In_re_Neagle wikiPageID "4402390".
- In_re_Neagle wikiPageRevisionID "565942481".
- In_re_Neagle arguedatea "--03-04".
- In_re_Neagle arguedateb "5".
- In_re_Neagle argueyear "1890".
- In_re_Neagle citation "10".
- In_re_Neagle decidedate "--04-14".
- In_re_Neagle decideyear "1890".
- In_re_Neagle dissent "Lamar".
- In_re_Neagle fullname "In re David Neagle".
- In_re_Neagle hasPhotoCollection In_re_Neagle.
- In_re_Neagle holding "Section 3 of Art. II of the U.S. Constitution requires that the Executive Branch "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." The court determined that the appointment of bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices ensured the faithful execution of the law of the United States. The court also relied on a statute granting marshals "the same powers, in executing the laws of the United States, as sheriffs and their deputies in such State may have, by law, in executing the laws thereof."".
- In_re_Neagle joindissent "Fuller".
- In_re_Neagle joinmajority "Bradley, Harlan, Gray, Blatchford, Brewer".
- In_re_Neagle lawsapplied "U.S. Const. Art. III, Sec. 788 of the Revised Statutes of the United States".
- In_re_Neagle litigants "In re Neagle".
- In_re_Neagle majority "Miller".
- In_re_Neagle notparticipating "Field".
- In_re_Neagle prior "Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California".
- In_re_Neagle scotus "1890".
- In_re_Neagle uspage "1".
- In_re_Neagle usvol "135".
- In_re_Neagle subject Category:1890_in_United_States_case_law.
- In_re_Neagle subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- In_re_Neagle type Case.
- In_re_Neagle type LegalCase.
- In_re_Neagle type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- In_re_Neagle type UnitOfWork.
- In_re_Neagle type Event.
- In_re_Neagle type Situation.
- In_re_Neagle comment "In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined the question of whether the Attorney General of the United States had authority to appoint U.S. Marshals as bodyguards to Supreme Court Justices.".
- In_re_Neagle label "In re Neagle".
- In_re_Neagle sameAs m.0c0b1b.
- In_re_Neagle sameAs Q6011704.
- In_re_Neagle sameAs Q6011704.
- In_re_Neagle wasDerivedFrom In_re_Neagle?oldid=565942481.
- In_re_Neagle isPrimaryTopicOf In_re_Neagle.
- In_re_Neagle name "In re David Neagle".