Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/In_re_Winship> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 50 of
50
with 100 items per page.
- In_re_Winship abstract "In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that when a juvenile is charged with an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, not preponderance of the evidence. The case has come to stand for a broader proposition, however: in a criminal prosecution, every essential element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 477 (2000); Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 278 (1993).".
- In_re_Winship wikiPageID "9858962".
- In_re_Winship wikiPageRevisionID "561112087".
- In_re_Winship arguedate "--01-20".
- In_re_Winship argueyear "1970".
- In_re_Winship citation "17280.0".
- In_re_Winship concurrence "Harlan".
- In_re_Winship decidedate "--03-31".
- In_re_Winship decideyear "1970".
- In_re_Winship dissent "Black".
- In_re_Winship dissent "Burger".
- In_re_Winship fullname "In the Matter of Samuel Winship, Appellant".
- In_re_Winship hasPhotoCollection In_re_Winship.
- In_re_Winship holding "The Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause requires that every element of a criminal offense be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, instead of the preponderance of the evidence standard used heretofore in juvenile court.".
- In_re_Winship joindissent "Stewart".
- In_re_Winship joinmajority "Douglas, Harlan, White, Marshall".
- In_re_Winship lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- In_re_Winship litigants "In re Winship".
- In_re_Winship majority "Brennan".
- In_re_Winship prior "17280.0".
- In_re_Winship scotus "1969".
- In_re_Winship uspage "358".
- In_re_Winship usvol "397".
- In_re_Winship subject Category:1970_in_United_States_case_law.
- In_re_Winship subject Category:Laws_affecting_youth_rights.
- In_re_Winship subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- In_re_Winship subject Category:United_States_children's_rights_case_law.
- In_re_Winship subject Category:United_States_criminal_burden_of_proof_case_law.
- In_re_Winship type Abstraction100002137.
- In_re_Winship type Collection107951464.
- In_re_Winship type Group100031264.
- In_re_Winship type Law108441203.
- In_re_Winship type LawsAffectingYouthRights.
- In_re_Winship type Case.
- In_re_Winship type LegalCase.
- In_re_Winship type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- In_re_Winship type UnitOfWork.
- In_re_Winship type Event.
- In_re_Winship type Situation.
- In_re_Winship comment "In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court decision that held that when a juvenile is charged with an act that would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, not preponderance of the evidence. The case has come to stand for a broader proposition, however: in a criminal prosecution, every essential element of the offense must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. See, e.g., Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.".
- In_re_Winship label "In re Winship".
- In_re_Winship label "In re Winship".
- In_re_Winship sameAs In_re_Winship.
- In_re_Winship sameAs m.02pv2k0.
- In_re_Winship sameAs Q3797381.
- In_re_Winship sameAs Q3797381.
- In_re_Winship sameAs In_re_Winship.
- In_re_Winship wasDerivedFrom In_re_Winship?oldid=561112087.
- In_re_Winship isPrimaryTopicOf In_re_Winship.
- In_re_Winship name "In the Matter of Samuel Winship, Appellant".