Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ingraham_v._Wright> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 52 of
52
with 100 items per page.
- Ingraham_v._Wright abstract "Ingraham vs. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the disciplinary corporal punishment policy of Florida's public schools by a 5–4 vote.James Ingraham was a 14-year-old eighth grade student at Charles R. Drew Junior High School in 1970. On October 6, 1970, Ingraham was accused of failing to promptly leave the stage of the school auditorium when asked to do so by a teacher. He was then taken to the school principal's office, where he stated that he was not guilty of the accusation against him. Willie J. Wright, Jr., the principal, ordered Ingraham to bend over so that Wright could spank Ingraham with a spanking paddle. When Ingraham declined to bend over and allow himself to be paddled, he was forcibly placed face-down on the top of a table. Lemmie Deliford, the assistant principal, held Ingraham's arms and Solomon Barnes, an assistant to the principal, held Ingraham's legs. While Ingraham was being restrained, Wright used a spanking paddle to hit Ingraham more than 20 times. The paddling was so severe that he suffered a hematoma requiring medical attention. Physicians instructed Ingraham to rest at home for a total of eleven days. He and his parents sued the school, calling it "cruel and unusual punishment" and loss of liberty, but lost the case. The Court held that Florida state tort laws provided sufficient remedies to satisfy Ingraham's due process loss of liberty claims. The Court also held that the U.S. Constitution's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to the corporal punishment of children in public schools, and that the constitution's due process clause does not require notice and a hearing prior to the imposition of corporal punishment in public schools.The Supreme Court declined to consider the plaintiffs' substantive due process claims in Ingraham v. Wright. Lower courts have adopted a variety of approaches to the substantive due process issue, none of which offer much protection for students who are subjected to corporal punishment at school. The Supreme Court has repeatedly denied certiorari (judicial review) on the issue of whether school corporal punishment constitutes a substantive due process constitutional violation.".
- Ingraham_v._Wright wikiPageExternalLink case.html.
- Ingraham_v._Wright wikiPageID "14079378".
- Ingraham_v._Wright wikiPageRevisionID "596711941".
- Ingraham_v._Wright arguedatea "--11-02".
- Ingraham_v._Wright arguedateb "3".
- Ingraham_v._Wright argueyear "1976".
- Ingraham_v._Wright citation "97".
- Ingraham_v._Wright decidedate "--04-19".
- Ingraham_v._Wright decideyear "1977".
- Ingraham_v._Wright dissent "Stevens".
- Ingraham_v._Wright dissent "White".
- Ingraham_v._Wright fullname "Ingraham, et al., v. Wright, et al.".
- Ingraham_v._Wright hasPhotoCollection Ingraham_v._Wright.
- Ingraham_v._Wright holding "The cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment did not apply to corporal punishment as a disciplinary practice in public schools, and the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment did not require notice or a hearing prior to imposition of such punishment, as the state's laws authorized the practice and allowed common law constraints and remedies.".
- Ingraham_v._Wright joindissent "Brennan, Marshall, Stevens".
- Ingraham_v._Wright joinmajority "Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist".
- Ingraham_v._Wright litigants "Ingraham v. Wright".
- Ingraham_v._Wright majority "Powell".
- Ingraham_v._Wright scotus "1975".
- Ingraham_v._Wright uspage "651".
- Ingraham_v._Wright usvol "430".
- Ingraham_v._Wright subject Category:1977_in_United_States_case_law.
- Ingraham_v._Wright subject Category:Corporal_punishments.
- Ingraham_v._Wright subject Category:Cruel_and_Unusual_Punishment_Clause_case_law.
- Ingraham_v._Wright subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Ingraham_v._Wright subject Category:United_States_civil_due_process_case_law.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Abstraction100002137.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Act100030358.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type CorporalPunishment101161161.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type CorporalPunishments.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Event100029378.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type GroupAction101080366.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type PsychologicalFeature100023100.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Punishment101160342.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type SocialControl101123598.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Case.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type LegalCase.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type UnitOfWork.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Event.
- Ingraham_v._Wright type Situation.
- Ingraham_v._Wright comment "Ingraham vs. Wright, 430 U.S. 651 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the disciplinary corporal punishment policy of Florida's public schools by a 5–4 vote.James Ingraham was a 14-year-old eighth grade student at Charles R. Drew Junior High School in 1970. On October 6, 1970, Ingraham was accused of failing to promptly leave the stage of the school auditorium when asked to do so by a teacher.".
- Ingraham_v._Wright label "Ingraham v. Wright".
- Ingraham_v._Wright sameAs m.03csx0s.
- Ingraham_v._Wright sameAs Q6033002.
- Ingraham_v._Wright sameAs Q6033002.
- Ingraham_v._Wright sameAs Ingraham_v._Wright.
- Ingraham_v._Wright wasDerivedFrom Ingraham_v._Wright?oldid=596711941.
- Ingraham_v._Wright isPrimaryTopicOf Ingraham_v._Wright.
- Ingraham_v._Wright name "Ingraham, et al., v. Wright, et al.".