Matches in DBpedia 2014 for { <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Jones_v._Flowers> ?p ?o. }
Showing items 1 to 43 of
43
with 100 items per page.
- Jones_v._Flowers abstract "Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the due process requirement that a state give notice to an owner before selling his property to satisfy his unpaid taxes. The Court ruled, 5-3, that after a mailed notice was returned unclaimed, a state was required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to take additional reasonable steps to notify the owner before the sale could proceed. The Court's opinion was delivered by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, his fourth majority opinion after his confirmation to the Court in 2005 and his first to provoke any dissenting opinions.The Court had last addressed the issue of notice in Dusenbery v. United States, 534 U.S. 161 (2002), which held that the government need only take steps reasonably calculated to provide notice even if actual notice is not achieved. The four justices who dissented in Dusenbery now formed the majority with Roberts in Jones v. Flowers, distinguishing the prior case on the basis that the government in Dusenbery did not know that its method of notice had failed before the taking occurred. Justice Clarence Thomas, in dissent, believed the Court was instead undermining Dusenbery, which he argued implicitly dictated a result contrary to the majority's decision.".
- Jones_v._Flowers wikiPageExternalLink 04-1477.pdf.
- Jones_v._Flowers wikiPageID "5120192".
- Jones_v._Flowers wikiPageRevisionID "602508674".
- Jones_v._Flowers arguedate "--01-17".
- Jones_v._Flowers argueyear "2006".
- Jones_v._Flowers citation "172800.0".
- Jones_v._Flowers decidedate "--04-26".
- Jones_v._Flowers decideyear "2006".
- Jones_v._Flowers dissent "Thomas".
- Jones_v._Flowers docket "4".
- Jones_v._Flowers fullname "Gary Kent Jones v. Linda K. Flowers and Mark Wilcox, Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands".
- Jones_v._Flowers hasPhotoCollection Jones_v._Flowers.
- Jones_v._Flowers holding "When the notice of a tax sale is returned unclaimed, the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process requires the State to take additional reasonable steps to contact the property owner before it can sell his property. Arkansas Supreme Court reversed and remanded.".
- Jones_v._Flowers joindissent "Scalia, Kennedy".
- Jones_v._Flowers joinmajority "Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer".
- Jones_v._Flowers lawsapplied Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution.
- Jones_v._Flowers litigants "Jones v. Flowers".
- Jones_v._Flowers majority "Roberts".
- Jones_v._Flowers notparticipating "Alito".
- Jones_v._Flowers prior "25920.0".
- Jones_v._Flowers scotus "2006".
- Jones_v._Flowers subsequent "2008".
- Jones_v._Flowers uspage "220".
- Jones_v._Flowers usvol "547".
- Jones_v._Flowers subject Category:2006_in_United_States_case_law.
- Jones_v._Flowers subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases.
- Jones_v._Flowers subject Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court.
- Jones_v._Flowers subject Category:United_States_civil_forfeiture_case_law.
- Jones_v._Flowers type Case.
- Jones_v._Flowers type LegalCase.
- Jones_v._Flowers type SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase.
- Jones_v._Flowers type UnitOfWork.
- Jones_v._Flowers type Event.
- Jones_v._Flowers type Situation.
- Jones_v._Flowers comment "Jones v. Flowers, 547 U.S. 220 (2006), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the due process requirement that a state give notice to an owner before selling his property to satisfy his unpaid taxes. The Court ruled, 5-3, that after a mailed notice was returned unclaimed, a state was required by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to take additional reasonable steps to notify the owner before the sale could proceed.".
- Jones_v._Flowers label "Jones v. Flowers".
- Jones_v._Flowers sameAs m.0d3lky.
- Jones_v._Flowers sameAs Q6275344.
- Jones_v._Flowers sameAs Q6275344.
- Jones_v._Flowers wasDerivedFrom Jones_v._Flowers?oldid=602508674.
- Jones_v._Flowers isPrimaryTopicOf Jones_v._Flowers.
- Jones_v._Flowers name "Gary Kent Jones v. Linda K. Flowers and Mark Wilcox, Arkansas Commissioner of State Lands".